Sign up here |
|
|---|

Why the existence of Snapchat breaks your media mental model
The Quiet Inversion
If you've been paying attention to ADOTAT over the last two months, none of what's coming next should surprise you.
If you haven't—well, let's catch you up.
The ad tech industry is undergoing a power transfer so clean, so polite, so wrapped in "partnership" language that most people won't realize it happened until it's already over.
Why You Can't Trust What You're Reading
Here's something that happened while you were scrolling LinkedIn: adtech companies just invested $1 million into launching an "adtech media network."
Read that again.
The companies being covered now own the outlet covering them.
This isn't a conspiracy. This is business. Smart business, actually. They're not the bad guys. They understand something fundamental: if you don't control the narrative, someone else will. And narratives shape markets. Markets shape valuations. Valuations shape exits.
So they did what any rational actor would do. They bought the microphone.
I'm not mad about it. I just have a different agenda.
My agenda is to tell you the truth, not push hype.
I don't own a DSP. I don't have equity in an SSP. I'm not launching a consultancy that depends on you believing the stack is inevitable. I don't get paid when you buy more martech.
Which means I can say things other people can't.
Like this:
We're Not Watching Incremental Improvements
This isn't "programmatic gets smarter" or "AI makes buying easier."
This is a fundamental migration of where decisions get made, who controls them, and what that control is worth.
We're watching:
The decision layer migrate from buyers to infrastructure owners
Portable intelligence become substrate-dependent optimization
Auditable rules become unauditable models
It's happening in three places simultaneously, and if you're not tracking all three, you're not seeing the full picture.
Three Signals Everyone Can See (If They're Looking)
1. Intelligence Moving Upstream
OpenX isn't just "improving their exchange." They built OpenXBuild—a platform that lets partners like tvScientific run AI models inside the exchange, before the DSP even sees the bid request.
Magnite is doing similar things with curation.
This isn't faster pipes. This is earlier thinking.
When optimization happens upstream—at the exchange level, before the auction—the DSP stops being where smart decisions get made. It becomes where pre-made decisions get executed.
That's not a product upgrade. That's a power shift.
2. "Agentic" Everything
Yahoo just announced agentic AI baked into planning, activation, optimization, and measurement. The Trade Desk is positioning itself as the coordination layer for agent-to-agent buying. AdCP—the "OpenRTB for agents"—is being standardized.
Everyone's talking about workflow convenience.
Nobody's talking about structural dependency.
When your campaigns "move themselves" inside someone else's infrastructure, you're not buying media anymore. You're renting a decision surface.
And once your performance depends on that surface, leaving becomes expensive. Not contractually. Architecturally.
Your models speak their APIs. Your audiences map to their identity graph. Your benchmarks are calibrated to their auction behavior.
Try moving that logic elsewhere and watch what happens to your numbers.
3. Measurement Becoming Mandatory
Incrementality testing is shifting from "special project we might do once" to "finance requires this quarterly."
Mid-market brands can now run 2-4 serious geo or household experiments per quarter. Not as heroic science. As routine operations.
And when they do, something uncomfortable happens:
20-40% of attributed conversions disappear.
Not fraud. Not lies. Just reality. Orders that would've happened anyway. Channels harvesting existing demand. Double-counting dressed up as performance.
When proof becomes cheap, belief becomes optional.
And an uncomfortable amount of the adtech ecosystem depends on belief to function.
The Uncomfortable Question
Here's the thing nobody wants to say out loud in the conference hallway:
If your performance only works inside one platform's walls, are you buying media... or renting a decision surface?
And if you're renting, who sets the terms?
Not you.
Not anymore.
The terms get set by whoever owns the substrate—the layer where your intelligence has to run, where your experiments have to execute, where your results get measured.
And that ownership is consolidating right now, while everyone's distracted by AI hype and CES demos.
What Happens Next
The free version tells you what's changing.
Who loses when the stack collapses and intelligence moves upstream
Where the bodies are buried (the vendors only viable under attribution, not incrementality)
How to position yourself before the terms of trade get set without you
Because here's the truth:
This isn't a debate anymore.
The substrate is being built. The protocols are being standardized. The power is being consolidated.
The only question is whether you understand the new terms while they're still forming...
...or after they're already locked in.
Stay Bold, Stay Curious, and Know More than You Did Yesterday.
ADOTAT+ subscribers get the full breakdown: which vendors survive falsification, where DSP margins collapse, and why OpenX's quiet ladder matters more than Yahoo's loud one. [80% off, limited time.]

The Rabbi of ROAS
Subscribe to our premium content at ADOTAT+ to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
Upgrade


