In partnership with
Rembrand’s AI: Product Placement Without the Headache
Why reshoot when you can remaster? Rembrand’s AI Studio lets you drop products into your videos like they were always meant to be there—seamlessly, effortlessly, and without the post-production migraines.
🎬 Creators: Monetize on your terms—no awkward ad breaks, just seamless integrations.
📢 Advertisers: Be part of the story, not an annoying pop-up.
Try it now and you could snag $10,000 (because who doesn’t love free money?).
AppLovin’s AI controversy, DoubleVerify’s shopping spree, and Google’s privacy dance—oh my! It’s like the adtech world decided to throw a scandal-themed party, and everyone showed up wearing their finest ethical gray area. From accusations of AI puffery that would make a Hollywood screenwriter blush to DoubleVerify’s quest for narrative control and Google’s creepy targeting shenanigans, this week’s lineup reads like a binge-worthy drama series. Popcorn, anyone?
Meanwhile, advertisers are crawling back to X like ex-lovers who can’t quit the toxicity, and programmatic audio ads are whispering personalized nothings in your earholes. Publicis is trying to keep a straight face with slower growth predictions, while ShopMy is banking on influencers selling authenticity like it’s a limited-edition sneaker drop. And let’s not forget the adtech merger mania—where buying relevance is the new innovation. Grab your seat; this industry rollercoaster isn’t slowing down anytime soon.
Learn AI in 5 minutes a day
This is the easiest way for a busy person wanting to learn AI in as little time as possible:
Sign up for The Rundown AI newsletter
They send you 5-minute email updates on the latest AI news and how to use it
You learn how to become 2x more productive by leveraging AI
🚨 AppLovin’s AI Smoke and Mirrors—Fraud or Just Really Creative Marketing?
🔍 The Accusation:
AppLovin is facing a public relations dumpster fire after short sellers Culper Research and Fuzzy Panda Research accused the adtech giant of cooking up more fiction than a Netflix series. The allegations? Overstating its AI capabilities, engaging in ad fraud, and—here's the kicker—secretly installing apps on user devices like some sort of digital Santa Claus, but creepier.
📜 The Evidence:
According to the short sellers, AppLovin's AI magic is about as real as unicorns, allegedly inflating performance metrics to keep investors smiling. Shares tumbled 23%, proving once again that Wall Street's love affair with AI is about as stable as a TikTok trend.
⚠️ The Catch:
CEO Adam Foroughi came out swinging, calling the allegations “false and misleading,” which is exactly what you’d expect someone accused of misleading investors to say. Meanwhile, AppLovin’s revenue reports show strong growth, but if your profits come from selling snake oil, are they really profits?
🔥 The Big Question:
Is this a targeted takedown by short sellers looking to make a quick buck, or did AppLovin get a little too creative with its marketing spin?
🎤 Industry Response:
The adtech world is quietly watching from the sidelines, popcorn in hand. If these allegations stick, expect a ripple effect across the industry, with investors giving the side-eye to every AI startup claiming to have cracked the code on digital ads.
🎭 AppLovin: Tech Unicorn or Smoke and Mirrors?
AppLovin has been hailed as a mobile advertising giant, leveraging AI to rake in revenue like it’s Black Friday every day. But recent reports from Culper Research and Fuzzy Panda Research suggest a different narrative—one involving inflated revenues, shady data practices, and even inappropriate ads targeting kids. Is this just another tech success story, or are we witnessing the unraveling of a modern-day Ponzi scheme?
🚀 Skyrocketing Success… Or Artificial Growth?
AppLovin’s stock prices soared, painting a picture of unprecedented growth. But according to the reports, this rise might be built on questionable foundations. Allegations suggest that the company isn’t just attracting users—they’re paying them. Through incentivization schemes involving gift cards and PayPal payouts, AppLovin is accused of artificially inflating in-app purchases. If true, this could mean that the company’s explosive growth is more illusion than reality.
🕵️ Under the Microscope: Data Theft and Ad Fraud
The allegations don’t stop at revenue inflation. AppLovin is also accused of stealing data from Meta and illegally tracking users, including children. If proven, this isn’t just a scandal—it’s a massive legal liability. The reports claim that AppLovin’s growth is powered by data obtained through backdoor installations, without user consent. In an age where digital privacy is paramount, these accusations could spell disaster.
🎢 The Rollercoaster Narrative
AppLovin’s success story has all the makings of a Hollywood blockbuster—meteoric rise, bold claims, and a seemingly unstoppable trajectory. But every hero has a weakness. If the reports are accurate, AppLovin’s narrative is less about tech innovation and more about financial smoke and mirrors. The company’s alleged reliance on get-paid-to-play schemes raises questions about the sustainability of its business model. What happens when the incentives dry up?
🔥 The Industry Is Watching
The ad-tech world is buzzing with speculation. Is AppLovin’s success story built on a fragile house of cards? If these allegations hold, the repercussions could ripple across the industry, shaking investor confidence and triggering regulatory crackdowns. CEO Adam Foroughi has denied the claims, calling them a smear campaign by short-sellers. But with the evidence mounting, his deflection strategy might not hold for long.
📉 The Stakes Are High
This isn’t just about AppLovin’s stock prices or reputation. It’s about the integrity of the ad-tech ecosystem. If the allegations are true, we’re looking at a scandal that could rival the likes of Cambridge Analytica. This story is far from over, and as more details emerge, the stakes will only get higher.
👀 Want the full scoop? Check out the detailed report online. 🍿 This is just the beginning—grab some popcorn because this saga is only getting juicier.
🚨 DoubleVerify’s $85M Rockerbox Bet—Expanding or Just Hoarding?
🔍 The Move:
DoubleVerify is shelling out $85 million to buy Rockerbox, aiming to transform itself from a media quality gatekeeper into a full-blown campaign optimization powerhouse. Because why just verify when you can dominate?
📜 The Strategy:
The acquisition is about expanding beyond basic ad measurement. With Rockerbox’s attribution tech, DoubleVerify wants to prove that your ad dollars actually do something, which would be revolutionary in an industry built on smoke and mirrors.
⚠️ The Catch:
Let’s be real—DoubleVerify is buying more than tech; it's buying a narrative. In a landscape where ‘transparency’ is just another buzzword, DoubleVerify wants to own the whole damn story. But will advertisers buy into this new role, or keep trusting their gut (or their spreadsheets)?
🔥 The Big Question:
Can DoubleVerify redefine itself as a one-stop-shop for ad performance, or will this acquisition end up as just another failed integration story?
🎤 Industry Response:
Rivals like Moat and IAS are either shaking in their boots or rolling their eyes. Either way, they’re definitely paying attention.
🚨 Advertisers Are Crawling Back to X—Are They Desperate or Just Forgiving?
🔍 The Return:
According to WPP CEO Mark Read, advertisers are reluctantly crawling back to X (formerly known as Twitter) after taking a post-election hiatus. Why? Because in the attention economy, even a dumpster fire attracts eyeballs.
📜 The Data:
Despite advertisers cautiously dipping their toes back in, WPP's revenue is flatter than a can of week-old Coke. Shares are at a four-year low, and the company is now scrambling with cost-cutting measures and investing in AI—because throwing money at buzzwords is apparently a business strategy.
⚠️ The Catch:
Advertisers are returning, but they're not exactly thrilled about it. It’s more like being stuck in a toxic relationship—too big to leave, too messy to love.
🔥 The Big Question:
Will advertisers’ return to X be short-lived, or is brand loyalty more flexible than we thought?
🎤 Industry Response:
Other agencies are cautiously watching, waiting to see if X’s ad platform has really improved or if they’re just throwing good money after bad impressions.
🚨 Adtech’s Merger Mania—Consolidation or Just Panic Buying?
🔍 The Surge:
The adtech world is buying up companies like they’re the last rolls of toilet paper before a hurricane. Mergers and acquisitions have surged by a whopping 118% year-over-year, driven by the insatiable need to stay relevant in an industry where last year’s innovation is this year’s punchline.
📜 The Strategy:
From retail media to streaming TV and influencer marketing, everyone’s gobbling up tech stacks to offer “comprehensive solutions,” which is adtech-speak for “please don’t look too closely at how little we actually do.” It’s the same logic as buying a gym membership in January—you’re not going to use it, but it makes you feel like you’re doing something productive.
⚠️ The Catch:
These acquisitions aren’t just about expanding capabilities; they’re about survival. In a market that changes faster than Elon Musk’s job titles, standing still is a death sentence. But are they buying synergy or just accumulating bloat?
🔥 The Big Question:
Is this consolidation about creating genuinely useful platforms or just a desperate attempt to stay relevant? Will advertisers actually see better results, or are we just building more walled gardens?
🎤 Industry Response:
Industry insiders are either gleefully counting their exit money or nervously updating their LinkedIn profiles. Either way, everyone’s bracing for the fallout.
🚨 Programmatic Audio Ads—Marketing’s New Favorite Echo Chamber?
🔍 The Growth:
Programmatic advertising is projected to snag 30% of digital audio ad spending this year, because apparently, nothing is sacred—not even your podcast safe space. With digital audio booming, marketers are now laser-targeting your earholes with personalized ads, ensuring you can’t even listen to true crime without being pitched a mattress.
📜 The Strategy:
This growth is all about automation and personalization. Programmatic tools are making it easy for advertisers to target audiences based on everything from favorite playlists to podcast genres. And while it’s creepy, it’s also incredibly effective—because who doesn’t want an ad for therapy right after a murder mystery episode?
⚠️ The Catch:
Personalization sounds great until you realize it’s just another word for surveillance. The line between relevant and creepy is thinner than ever, and one wrong step could send consumers running to ad-free platforms faster than you can say “premium subscription.”
🔥 The Big Question:
Will hyper-targeted audio ads become the new normal, or will listener backlash force a rethink? And if they get too personalized, will people just start paying to make the ads go away?
🎤 Industry Response:
Podcast creators are eyeing the extra revenue, while privacy advocates are lighting their torches. It’s a high-stakes game, and everyone’s waiting to see who gets burned first.
🚨 Publicis Predicts Slower Growth—Optimism or Just a Good Poker Face?
🔍 The Forecast:
Publicis is predicting a slight slowdown in organic growth for 2025, estimating a 4% to 5% increase compared to last year’s 5.8%. In other words, they’re still growing—just not as fast. But hey, in this economy, flat is the new up.
📜 The Strategy:
To keep investors smiling, Publicis is doubling down on AI and tech acquisitions, planning to invest another €100 million into the AI hype machine. Because nothing says “we’re fine” like spending millions on buzzwords.
⚠️ The Catch:
They’re banking on data and AI to sustain growth, but let’s be real—AI is still more flash than substance. Plus, with a flat revenue and profit margin forecast, the real challenge will be keeping up appearances without triggering a stock market tantrum.
🔥 The Big Question:
Can Publicis keep growing in a world where ad budgets are tighter than a startup’s lunch budget? And how much longer can they ride the AI wave before someone notices the emperor isn’t wearing any clothes?
🎤 Industry Response:
Competitors are watching closely, eager to pounce on any sign of weakness. Meanwhile, investors are nervously hoping Publicis’ poker face holds up.
Publicis’ AI Gamble: Growth or Grand Illusion?
Is Publicis Riding the AI Wave or Just Surfing on Hype?
Publicis is betting big on artificial intelligence. Really big. To the tune of $110 million this year alone, with a grand plan to drop $330 million over three years. That’s not pocket change; that’s a yacht in the Mediterranean with champagne on tap. It’s the kind of spending that says, “We’re not worried,” even if they have every reason to be.
Because while Publicis is talking about a “slight” slowdown in growth—4% to 5% in 2025 compared to last year’s 5.8%—they’re also doing the corporate two-step, desperately trying to keep up appearances. Like a middle-aged dad at a wedding, they’re keeping the rhythm, but it’s painfully obvious they’re running out of moves.
But what’s really going on behind the curtain? Is Publicis genuinely optimistic, or are they playing a high-stakes game of corporate poker, banking on the fact that no one will call their bluff?
The AI Hype Train: All Aboard
Publicis is hitching its wagon to AI like it’s the second coming of digital advertising. They’re not just investing in AI—they’re doubling down, tripling down, going all-in on the belief that algorithms can save them from a sluggish market. It’s like they found a magic lamp labeled “AI” and are rubbing it for dear life, hoping a genie pops out with a growth strategy.
But let’s get real: AI is still more buzzword than business model. It’s the “blockchain” of 2024—everybody’s talking about it, nobody really knows what it does, and only a handful of people are actually making money off it. Yet Publicis is throwing money at it like a toddler feeding a slot machine, convinced that eventually, the payout will be huge.
Their grand vision? To integrate AI across everything from media planning to creative production. They’re basically saying, “Don’t worry about the slowdown, because robots are coming to save the day!” But here’s the kicker: AI isn’t a strategy; it’s a tool. And tools are only as good as the people using them.
The Emperor’s New AI Clothes
There’s an old story about an emperor who paraded around in invisible clothes, convinced he looked fabulous. That’s basically Publicis right now, strutting around in AI-powered bravado, hoping nobody notices the revenue growth slowdown peeking through the seams.
Publicis’ flagship AI platform, CoreAI, is supposedly the game-changer. It’s built on a treasure trove of data—2.3 billion consumer profiles and trillions of data points about content and media performance. That sounds impressive until you realize that most of that data is the same stuff every other digital giant is sitting on. It’s like bragging about having a really big Excel spreadsheet.
Sure, they’ve got AI agents and machine learning models humming along, automating processes and optimizing campaigns. But here’s the thing: AI can’t create demand where there isn’t any. It can’t convince companies to spend more on advertising in an economy where budgets are tighter than a hipster’s skinny jeans.
So while Publicis is banking on AI to fuel growth, the reality is that it’s just a fancy way of squeezing more juice out of the same lemon. And if the lemon is running dry, no amount of AI wizardry is going to change that.
The Growth Dilemma: Flat is the New Up
Let’s cut through the corporate jargon: Publicis is forecasting slower growth because the ad industry is in a slump. Brands are tightening their belts, shifting budgets to more “measurable” digital platforms, and generally not spending like it’s 1999.
Publicis’ 4% to 5% growth forecast isn’t terrible—some would kill for those numbers. But in an industry where investors expect double digits, it’s like showing up to prom in a minivan. Sure, you made it, but nobody’s impressed.
Their answer? Spend big on tech and acquisitions. Publicis is planning to shell out between $880 and $990 million on targeted acquisitions in 2025, focusing on digital media and proprietary data. They’re basically buying up innovation instead of building it, which is the corporate equivalent of buying followers on Instagram—flashy, but ultimately hollow.
The Great AI Experiment: Vision or Vaporware?
Publicis is placing its bets on AI revolutionizing everything from media buying to creative development. They’re talking about “efficiency gains” and “predictive analytics” like they’ve discovered the holy grail. But the reality is far less glamorous.
AI in advertising is mostly about automating mundane tasks—optimizing bids, personalizing content, crunching data. It’s useful, sure, but it’s not revolutionary. It’s like swapping out your old coffee pot for a Keurig—not a game-changer, just a slightly more convenient way to get the same caffeine fix.
And then there’s the bigger issue: AI works best with clean, accurate data. But the ad industry is notorious for dirty data—duplicate profiles, incomplete datasets, inaccurate targeting. Publicis is banking on AI to fix a problem that’s fundamentally human: bad inputs lead to bad outputs. Garbage in, garbage out.
The Real Game: Managing Expectations
Publicis isn’t just fighting for growth; they’re fighting to keep investors happy. And that’s a different ballgame altogether. They’re playing a delicate balancing act—promising innovation and growth while quietly preparing for a slowdown. It’s like baking a cake while simultaneously trying to convince everyone you’re on a diet.
Their projected operating margin—slightly above 18%—isn’t exactly inspiring confidence. It’s more of a “we’re surviving” than a “we’re thriving.” And with no major account wins since August 2024, Publicis is running on fumes.
Yet they’re still putting on a brave face, increasing dividends by 5.9% to keep shareholders from jumping ship. It’s a classic move—pay off investors with short-term gains to buy time for long-term bets. But if the AI investments don’t pay off, they’ll be left holding an expensive bag of nothing.
The Final Act: Growth or Grand Illusion?
Publicis is performing a masterclass in corporate theater. They’re betting on AI, spending like they’ve got a golden goose, and smiling through gritted teeth as they predict slower growth. It’s a tightrope act, and they’re praying the audience doesn’t notice the safety net is missing.
Their strategy boils down to this: bluff big, spend bigger, and hope nobody calls them out before the investments pay off. It’s risky, bold, and a little bit crazy. But in an industry built on smoke and mirrors, maybe that’s exactly what they need to stay in the game.
Publicis is betting the house on AI, but the question remains: is this the future of advertising, or just another grand illusion? Either way, they’ve already sold the show. Now they just have to deliver.
🚨 ShopMy Raises $77.5M—Influencer Marketing or Just More Sponsored Nonsense?
🔍 The Move:
ShopMy just secured $77.5 million in a Series B round, bumping its valuation to $410 million. The plan? Expand influencer marketing tools and invade international markets like a Trojan horse filled with #sponsored content.
📜 The Strategy:
With over 550 brands and 100,000 creators already on board, ShopMy is riding the influencer wave, betting that Gen Z’s love for curated authenticity will keep the cash flowing. Basically, they’re turning every Instagram feed into QVC, but with better lighting.
⚠️ The Catch:
Influencer marketing is lucrative, but it’s also one viral scandal away from imploding. Plus, as more platforms crack down on undisclosed sponsorships, the days of sly product placements might be numbered.
🔥 The Big Question:
Will ShopMy revolutionize influencer marketing, or are we just one TikTok exposé away from another Fyre Festival-level fiasco?
🎤 Industry Response:
Brands are excited, influencers are counting their future stacks, and cynics are waiting for the bubble to burst. Either way, influencer marketing isn’t going away—it’s just getting more expensive.
🚨 IPG’s Not-So-Hot Quarter—Is Ad Spend on a Diet?
📉 The Sad Reality
Interpublic Group (IPG) just posted a fourth-quarter report that’s about as exciting as watching paint dry—unless you’re an investor, in which case, it’s downright painful. Revenue is down 3% in the U.S. and U.K., 3% in Europe, and nearly 8% in Asia Pacific. In the ad world, that’s like missing your New Year’s resolution before January even ends.
📜 Blame It on the Economy
IPG warned about “economic and political uncertainty” back in October, and—surprise!—that’s exactly what happened. Brands got skittish, ad budgets got trimmed, and suddenly, IPG’s Q4 numbers were looking thinner than an agency’s lunch break.
⚠️ The Competitive Smackdown
Meanwhile, Omnicom, IPG’s arch-nemesis, somehow managed to post stronger-than-expected earnings. And now, the two companies are merging into what will be the world’s largest advertising agency in a $13 billion deal that’s sure to give regulators heartburn.
🔥 The Big Question
Is IPG just having a rough patch, or are we looking at a long-term slowdown in ad spend? And with global advertising growth expected to drag in 2025, will this mega-merger be a lifeline—or a Titanic-sized headache?
🎤 Industry Chatter
IPG still owns some of the biggest names in advertising, but if clients keep tightening budgets, that won’t matter. Stay tuned for how this consolidation drama unfolds—because when two giant ad holding companies merge, you just know there will be fireworks.
🚨 Google’s Creepy Targeting—Is Privacy Just a Suggestion?
🔍 The Accusation:
A WIRED investigation revealed that Google’s Display & Video 360 (DV360) platform is serving up targeted ads based on disturbingly sensitive user data, including health conditions and government job titles. Because nothing says “ethical advertising” like profiting off someone’s medical history.
📜 The Evidence:
WIRED’s deep dive shows that DV360 uses categories that sound more like a government watchlist than ad segments. This revelation is as shocking as learning that cookies aren’t just delicious—they’re also stalkers.
⚠️ The Catch:
Google claims it’s all within policy guidelines, which is like a thief saying it’s not stealing if the door was unlocked. But given Europe’s increasingly strict privacy laws, Google might be playing with fire—or at least hefty fines.
🔥 The Big Question:
Is Google’s targeting brilliance or just plain creepy? More importantly, will regulators finally wake up or keep hitting the snooze button?
🎤 Industry Response:
The adtech community is nervously quiet, knowing full well that if regulators come for Google, they could be next.
🚨 Adalytics and Quad Team Up—Transparency or Just a Power Grab?
🔍 The Move:
Adalytics, the ad tech watchdog known for calling out bad behavior faster than a high school snitch, just partnered with Quad and its media agency, Rise Interactive. The deal? Quad will use Adalytics' automated log-file analysis and custom reporting tools to get deeper insights into their media buys, allegedly to enhance effectiveness and efficiency. Or, as the cynical would say, to figure out why ad dollars keep evaporating into the digital ether.
📜 The Strategy:
Adalytics promises transparency with tools that go behind the curtain of programmatic ad placements. In theory, this means Quad gets a better look at where its ads are actually running, sidestepping the brand safety nightmares that have plagued the industry. But let’s be honest, in ad tech, “transparency” often translates to “we found a new way to sell you something.”
⚠️ The Catch:
Adalytics has made a name for itself by exposing industry shadiness, but this partnership smells like a pivot. Are they still a watchdog, or have they found a more lucrative gig as a market influencer? It’s a classic tale: First, you make noise to get attention, then you cash in on credibility.
🔥 The Big Question:
Is Adalytics genuinely committed to transparency, or is this just a strategic play to capture market share? After all, the best way to corner a market is to first create distrust in your competitors, then swoop in as the savior with the “solution.”
🎤 Industry Response:
Some are praising the move as a step toward accountability, while others are side-eyeing it like a cat watching a dog fake a limp for treats. If Adalytics continues to release explosive reports while cozying up to big clients, their watchdog status might come into question.
AdDog(TM): 🐾 Adalytics and Quad/Graphics: Watchdog or Lapdog?
Adalytics just teamed up with Quad/Graphics and its media agency Rise Interactive, and let me tell you, it's like they just sniffed out a juicy bone in the digital ad world. They’re on a mission to dig up the dirt on low-quality media placements and give the industry a transparency bath it desperately needs. But before we roll over in excitement, let’s see if they’re barking up the right tree.
🦴 The Partnership
Picture this: Quad/Graphics has fetched Adalytics’ tools to keep their ads from chasing phantom squirrels (a.k.a., non-human traffic) across media-buying platforms. They’re promising media transparency, advanced impression-level analysis, and a whole lot of kibble about quality assurance.
They say they’re setting new standards for digital ad transparency. That’s like the neighbor’s dog claiming to have the best chew toy—bold, but let’s see if it squeaks.
🐾 What’s in the Doggie Bag?
Here’s what Rise Interactive is bringing to the dog park with Adalytics:
Media-quality and efficiency monitoring – because no one wants to be barking up a dead tree.
Brand-safety analysis – ensuring ads don’t end up in the wrong yard.
Supply-path optimization (SPO) – mapping the shortest route to the juiciest bones (or in this case, the best ad placements).
Geo-targeting compliance – because no one wants to do their business on the wrong lawn.
"Made-for-advertising" (MFA) site detection – sniffing out the fake fire hydrants of the internet.
🐕 Context: Why Now?
This partnership is trotting in at a time when ad fraud is the mangy mutt nobody wants in their yard. Adalytics has been barking about industry shenanigans, like accusing DoubleVerify of letting ads run alongside… let’s just say, some unsavory content. Now they’re promising to be the watchdog for Quad/Graphics. But here’s the itch: can a watchdog still be trusted when it's napping on the client’s porch?
🐶 The Curious Case of the Watchdog
Adalytics built its reputation as an industry watchdog, but now it’s playing fetch with a major player. Will they keep their bark, or just wag their tail for a paycheck? It’s a risky game—like a guard dog moonlighting as a lapdog.
Quad/Graphics is marketing this as a move for better media quality and performance insights. But is this about transparency or just about looking good in the dog show?
🔥 The Big Questions:
Can Adalytics maintain its reputation as an unbiased watchdog while getting cozy with Quad/Graphics?
Is this about genuine transparency, or just some new tricks to keep advertisers from jumping the fence?
Will this partnership set a new standard or just ruffle some fur?
🐕 Industry Implications:
Transparency Tail Wagging: If they pull this off, it could raise the bar for transparency, making other ad tech companies feel the bite.
Watchdog or Lapdog? Adalytics risks becoming too close to the clients they’re supposed to watchdog. Are they compromising their growl for a belly rub?
AI Fetching: Their use of AI could trigger a game of fetch, with competitors scrambling to get similar tools.
The Pack Mentality: This might push competitors to sniff out new partnerships or acquisitions, creating a pack mentality in the industry.
📌 Developing… Stay tuned.
Whether they’re the watchdogs we need or just another pup playing for treats, this partnership is shaking up the industry. But until we see if they bite or just bark, we’ll keep a close eye on the doghouse.
I’ll be sniffing out more details and keeping my ear to the ground. Who knows? This might just be the dogfight that changes the game.
Subscribe to our premium content at ADOTAT+ to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
Upgrade