Bots, Bowls, and Billion-Dollar Blunders: This Week in Ad Shenanigans

Welcome to This Week in Advertising and Marketing, Where the Industry is in Its ‘Doomsday Cult’ Era

In partnership with

Rembrand’s AI: Product Placement Without the Headache

Why reshoot when you can remaster? Rembrand’s AI Studio lets you drop products into your videos like they were always meant to be there—seamlessly, effortlessly, and without the post-production migraines.

🎬 Creators: Monetize on your terms—no awkward ad breaks, just seamless integrations.
📢 Advertisers: Be part of the story, not an annoying pop-up.

Try it now and you could snag $10,000 (because who doesn’t love free money?).

Adtech is a dysfunctional family drama, and Andy Dhanik has had a front-row seat to all the chaos. In this episode, he pulls back the curtain on the backstabbing, inflated bid prices, and mystery fees that keep the industry running (and ad buyers blissfully unaware).

Run ads IRL with AdQuick

With AdQuick, you can now easily plan, deploy and measure campaigns just as easily as digital ads, making them a no-brainer to add to your team’s toolbox.

You can learn more at www.AdQuick.com

Welcome back to another edition of ADOTAT Week in Review, where we break down the biggest ad tech dumpster fires, corporate shell games, and marketing magic tricks—all so you can nod knowingly in meetings and pretend the industry isn’t just one big programmatic fever dream.

This week? Oh, it’s a good one. Microsoft’s ad platform is being accused of hosting a bot rave, DoubleVerify is investing in a VC firm that just happens to own a media outlet covering ad tech (nothing suspicious about that, right?), and Senators are dunking on Amazon and Google for serving ads next to the absolute worst kind of internet content. Meanwhile, Kevel is making big moves in retail media, IPG is trying to look attractive before Omnicom fully swallows it whole, and the Super Bowl once again reminded us that TV advertising is still the only thing keeping traditional media execs from full-blown existential crises.

And let’s not forget TripleLift’s new CEO, who just inherited the kind of “opportunity” that sounds great on a LinkedIn post but might have him questioning all his life choices by Q3.

So, grab your overpriced oat milk latte, fire up that ad-blocker you pretend you don’t use, and let’s dive into the mess.

🚨 Aimclear vs. Microsoft: A PR Stunt or a Real Problem?

🔍 The Accusation:
Microsoft’s ad platform is riddled with fake leads, spam bots, and imaginary businesses—at least according to Aimclear, an agency that’s never been shy about making a scene. Founder Marty Weintraub says the fraud is “very sophisticated”, which is a nice way of saying old-school click farming is back like a bad ex who won’t stop texting.

📜 The Evidence:
Internal documents reportedly show sketchy activity across multiple clients, with bogus names, fake businesses, and the kind of traffic that makes programmatic buyers wake up in cold sweats.

⚠️ The Catch:
Marty is, let’s just say, a character. Known for stirring the pot, he’s as subtle as a sledgehammer. So the question is:
🔥 Is Microsoft actually asleep at the wheel? Or is this a well-timed PR stunt? Most feel its a PR stunt by a guy stuck in 2005.

🎤 We’ve reached out to Microsoft and industry experts. If they respond, we’ll update you. If they ghost us… well, that says something too.

📌 Developing… Stay tuned.

🚀 Kevel’s Next Move: From Retail Media to Off-Site Domination

🎭 The Pivot:
Remember Adzerk? Yeah, neither does anyone else—because in 2020, it reinvented itself as Kevel and dodged the ad server apocalypse by pivoting into retail media just as it became the hottest thing since programmatic fraud. Now, they’re expanding again, and this time, they want off-site action.

🔗 The Nexta Play:
Kevel is teaming up with Nexta to push retail media ads beyond brand-owned sites. Translation? Retailers can now run campaigns across TikTok, Meta, YouTube, and other walled gardens without being chained to their own websites.

🔥 Why It Matters:
With cookies crumbling like bad AdTech excuses, probabilistic attribution is becoming the new religion. Kevel’s move plays right into that shift—offering retailers a single interface to buy ads across the web, mimicking the Amazon/Walmart ad powerhouse model without actually being Amazon or Walmart.

🤔 The Big Question:
Can Kevel carve out a serious role in retail media’s next evolution, or will The Trade Desk, Google, and Amazon laugh them out of the room? DSPs already dominate cross-platform media buying, and if Kevel isn’t careful, it might end up as a glorified feature, not a standalone powerhouse.

⚡ Senators Call Out Amazon, Google & Ad Verification Firms Over CSAM Ads

🚨 The Scandal:
If you thought brand safety tech actually worked, buckle up. Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) just put Amazon, Google, IAS, and DoubleVerify on blast for serving ads next to child exploitation material (CSAM)—which is, you know, literally the worst-case scenario for an ad placement.

💣 The Adalytics Bombshell:
Researchers at Adalytics stumbled across programmatic ads running on CSAM sites while working on a completely different project (because of course they did). Using URLscan.io, they identified ads appearing on file-sharing sites infamous for hosting illegal content—proving, yet again, that ad tech’s ability to prevent this garbage is basically a coin flip.

🔍 The Fallout:
So now, the big ad verification firms—IAS, DoubleVerify, and the like—have some explaining to do. They’ve built their entire multi-billion-dollar business model on ensuring ads don’t land in the worst places imaginable, yet here we are.

Will these firms finally admit their tech isn’t as airtight as they claim? Or will we get another round of corporate PR spin about how “complex” programmatic ad placement is?

I have to say more about this because I am absolutely furious.

You want to talk about brand safety? Let’s talk about the worst-kept secret in adtech—the part they don’t put in the glossy sales decks or the smug LinkedIn posts about “protecting brands.”

Ads are funding child exploitation. Period.

And the companies responsible? They’re either too incompetent to stop it or too greedy to care.

I know this game better than most. Back in the ‘90s, while some of you were still figuring out how to dial into AOL, I was working as a special investigator for the Secret Service’s Electronic Crimes Task Force. Not an agent—couldn’t be, because I’m practically bat-blind—but they still wanted my hacking expertise. Trained in computer forensics. Worked on child exploitation cases. Had the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children inside my office. Trained by ASAIC Robert-freaking-Weaver, a legend in this field.

I’ve personally worked cases where we caught monsters who raped hundreds of kids. We caught them on video. We caught them at JFK, smuggling drugs and toys for their next victims. And do you know what some judges told me? That photos of naked children were just “artwork.” Let that sink in.

So when some suit from a verification company or an SSP tells you that this is “just a little problem” in ad tech? That it’s a rounding error? Bull***.* If it were “just a little,” they wouldn’t be trying so hard to cover it up. They’re trying because there’s money in it. And this is just what’s been caught. Who knows how much cash is flowing to these sites undetected?

Why does this keep happening? Because SSPs lie. Because DoubleVerify and IAS can’t do what they claim. Because it’s all just an expensive game of “we tried our best” while their clients shovel money into a black box.

And now, Senators Marsha Blackburn and Richard Blumenthal are dragging Amazon, Google, and the verification firms into the spotlight for serving ads next to CSAM. Adalytics found it—not because they were looking for it, but because it was so blatant that they stumbled across it while researching something completely different. Let that sink in. They weren’t even trying, and they still found a mess that ad tech’s billion-dollar “brand safety” industry failed to catch.

So now, the big firms have two options:

1️⃣ Admit they’re running a multi-billion-dollar scam, or
2️⃣ Spew another round of corporate nonsense about how “complicated” programmatic is.

Either way, their time’s up.

🏆 Super Bowl 59: A Ratings and Ad Revenue Blowout

📺 The Numbers:
The biggest spectacle in American advertising just got even bigger. A whopping 127.7 million viewers tuned in, making Super Bowl 59 the most-watched ever. That’s more eyeballs than most streaming platforms see in a year.

💰 The Ad Spend:
If you thought $8 million for a 30-second spot was steep, brands clearly didn’t. Fox walked away with over $800 million in ad revenue, proving that when it comes to live events, advertisers will throw money at the screen faster than a frustrated fantasy football player.

🔥 Why It Matters:
In an era where TV ratings are crumbling like third-party cookies, the Super Bowl remains the last true mass-reach event. It’s a unicorn—a moment where brands can get in front of nearly half the country at once. No walled gardens, no messy ad-tech middlemen—just pure, undivided attention.

So while digital platforms fight over micro-targeted crumbs, live events like this still serve up the whole damn cake.

📉 IPG’s Struggles Continue Amid Omnicom Merger

💰 The Earnings Report:
IPG pulled in $9.2 billion in 2024, but here’s the kicker—Q4 saw a 1.8% organic revenue decline. In other words, the growth train hit a red light, just as it’s trying to look pretty for its soon-to-be corporate overlords.

✂️ The Plan:
IPG is embracing the tried-and-true “streamlining efficiencies” playbook, which, in plain English, means cost-cutting, offshoring, and layoffs. Because nothing says “we’re strong and stable” like scrambling to save $250 million before a merger.

💍 The Merger Drama:
With Omnicom’s takeover looming, IPG is in full-on “look valuable before the deal closes” mode. But let’s be real—this is survival, not strategy. The big question is: Will IPG enter the Omnicom era as an asset or just dead weight?

We’ve reached out to IPG and Omnicom for comment. Let’s see if they have a narrative better than "please ignore the financial turbulence."

📢 TripleLift’s New CEO: Can Dave Helmreich Shake Things Up?

🔄 The Move:
TripleLift just handed the reins to Dave Helmreich, former chief commercial officer at Innovid. The guy knows his way around ad tech, but stepping into the CEO seat comes with a whole new set of headaches.

📺 The Challenge:
TripleLift has been pushing hard into CTV and premium inventory, but let’s be honest—programmatic is still a mess, and scaling in CTV isn’t exactly plug-and-play. Helmreich’s mission? Prove TripleLift isn’t just another SSP trying to fight Google and The Trade Desk for scraps.

💡 The Big Question:
Can Helmreich actually drive meaningful growth, or is he about to find out that CTV’s big dollars come with even bigger hurdles? Because if the past few years have taught us anything, it’s that expanding in CTV is a lot harder than slapping a "premium" label on ad inventory.

We’ll be watching. Closely.

AdDog(TM): 🐶 Omnicom’s Merger: A Corporate Kennel Shake-Up or Just Another Dog-and-Pony Show? 🦴

Omnicom’s proposed merger is shaping up to be less of a strategic masterstroke and more of an alpha dog move to guard its kibble stash. Under the condition of pseudonimity (because even adtech hounds know when to keep their tails tucked), the real strategy here isn't innovation—it’s margin protection. But will this pack reorganization actually make the brand stronger, or is it just a fancy way to paper over some aging pedigree problems?

🐕 Keeping the Hunters, Not the Lapdogs

If Omnicom wants this to work, they better not send the real hunters to the pound. Account managers—the ones who actually sniff out revenue—are the lifeblood of these agencies. But if history tells us anything, the senior management—those overfed retrievers lounging in corner offices with a plush view—will likely stay put, wagging their tails and barking orders while the real work gets done elsewhere. That’s not a winning strategy. Less executive bloat, more agility—that’s what this pack needs.

🐩 Less Competition? Bad News for Brands

Every time a big dog eats another, the industry gets a little less competitive. And that never leads to lower ad costs or better service—it just means more power sitting in fewer paws. Brands are left with fewer options, leashed to a shrinking number of holding companies who dictate terms with all the charm of a bulldog at a bone convention.

🐕‍🦺 Acxiom: Not a Guard Dog, Just Dead Weight

And then there’s Acxiom. If this merger had any real technological synergy, maybe it would be worth some tail wags. But Acxiom is less a guard dog and more a liability on a leash—and Omnicom knows it. Expect them to take it out back and quietly let it 'retire' to that farm upstate. You know, the one where underperforming data assets go when they stop being useful.

🐾 The Verdict: A Lot of Bark, But Will It Bite?

Mergers are supposed to create stronger packs, but this one smells more like desperation than dominance. If Omnicom wants to make it work, they’ll need to keep the workhorses, trim the show dogs, and not just slap a new collar on the same old problems. Otherwise, this might just be another case of a big agency marking its territory—without actually delivering anything worth howling about. 🐶💨

Adtech Dog is a new column written with the kind of wit that cuts like a well-placed programmatic bid—sharp, fast, and impossible to ignore. Penned by a famous industry commentator who prefers to stay off the record, this insider has seen it all, from DSP wars to the latest cookie-less chaos. Expect irreverent takes, industry gossip, and the kind of brutally honest analysis that makes ad execs shift uncomfortably in their seats.

Subscribe to our premium content at ADOTAT+ to read the rest.

Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.