Ad fraud is the cockroach of digital advertising—no matter how much money, tech, or moral outrage gets thrown at it, it refuses to die. The industry loses $22 billion a year to fraudulent impressions, bot traffic, and made-for-advertising garbage, yet everyone pretends it’s just the cost of doing business. It’s like watching someone set their wallet on fire and then shrug because “that’s just how things work around here.”

Wasserlauf, founder of BlockBoard, looked at this flaming pile of wasted money and thought, there has to be a better way. His solution? Blockchain-powered transparency—because the only way to clean up this mess is by verifying every ad transaction in real time. No middlemen, no shady backroom deals, just proof that ads are actually doing what marketers paid for.

It’s a simple concept: If you’re spending millions on digital ads, shouldn’t you know whether they’re reaching real people? But in an industry built on vague reporting and willful ignorance, actually demanding accountability is treated as revolutionary.

And that’s exactly why the big players hate it.

Say the word blockchain in an ad industry boardroom, and watch the panic set in. Executives start clutching their pearls like you just suggested replacing their entire media budget with Dogecoin. For most of them, blockchain is just another entry in the long list of tech buzzwords that have overpromised and underdelivered.

And who can blame them?

Wasserlauf saw what was happening and realized the real value of blockchain had nothing to do with trading monkey JPEGs—it’s about verification. His company, BlockBoard, uses blockchain as a tamper-proof system for digital advertising that ensures:
✔️ Your ad was served to a real human.
✔️ Your money didn’t vanish into the programmatic black hole.
✔️ You aren’t paying for bot traffic that generates zero revenue.

It’s ad tech’s worst-kept secret that nobody actually knows where half of their media dollars go. The supply chain is so bloated and opaque that even the agencies running the buys can’t give a straight answer. Blockchain changes that by documenting every single ad transaction in a way that can’t be faked.

But here’s the kicker—advertisers don’t want to admit how much money they’ve been wasting. If you suddenly prove that 40% of your ad spend is going into a digital abyss, someone’s going to have to answer for it. And that’s why the industry has treated blockchain like a dirty word: it forces accountability in a system designed to avoid it.

Why reshoot when you can remaster? Rembrand’s AI Studio lets you drop products into your videos like they were always meant to be there—seamlessly, effortlessly, and without the post-production migraines.

🎬 Creators: Monetize on your terms—no awkward ad breaks, just seamless integrations.
📢 Advertisers: Be part of the story, not an annoying pop-up.

Try it now and you could snag $10,000 (because who doesn’t love free money?).

🔗 Rembrand AI | Virtual Product Placement, Made Easy.

Big ad agencies love to talk about transparency, but the second you ask them to show their work, suddenly it’s all smoke, mirrors, and “proprietary methodologies.” For decades, they’ve been running the same con—making sure advertisers never really know where their money is going. So when Matt Wasserlauf waltzes in with blockchain receipts, they react like a mobster seeing an IRS audit notice.

Wasserlauf saw it firsthand. “I built the industry with the largest agencies,” he says. “So they were the first people I turned to when I said, ‘Hey, there’s a new way.’ And I was met with tremendous resistance, fierce resistance.” That’s polite corporate speak for they told me to take my transparency and shove it.

Rather than waste time trying to convince the big holding companies to stop printing money, BlockBoard is working with small and mid-sized agencies that actually care about results. “We focus on brands that don’t typically go to those big four or five public ad agencies,” he says. “They’re the ones looking for real business outcomes—sales, leads, actual revenue—not just impressions.”

And it’s working. “We take a $50,000 or $100,000 media test, and they see a 3X or 10X return on ad spend. Then they come back and say, ‘What can you do with $250,000? What about a million?’ That’s when things get exciting.”

Wasserlauf sees the cracks forming. “We’re seeing layoffs at the big four, we’re seeing merger talks. The temperature is changing,” he says. “The big guys are starting to realize they can’t keep operating this way forever.”

It’s not a matter of if they’ll adopt transparency—it’s when. And by the time they do, Wasserlauf and his clients will already be miles ahead. “It’s going to be cataclysmic,” he predicts. “And frankly? They brought it on themselves.”

Marketers have a deep, unshakable love for doing things the way they’ve always been done—even when those things are obviously, painfully broken. “It’s human nature,” Matt Wasserlauf says. “No one likes change. And in advertising, it’s even worse. Everyone is so obsessed with keeping things exactly the way they were, even when it’s clear they’re wasting a fortune.”

The ad industry has spent three decades quoting John Wanamaker’s line about not knowing which half of ad spend is wasted, but instead of actually fixing the problem, they’ve built entire careers around pretending it’s just the cost of doing business. “We used to talk about how digital was going to change that, right?” Wasserlauf says. “We had this whole promise—real-time data, real metrics, finally seeing what works. And then? We just let it all go because waste is profitable.”

BlockBoard’s approach is simple: Stop measuring nonsense and start focusing on what actually drives business. “The old way of measuring performance was reach, frequency, impressions—none of that tells you if the ad worked,” Wasserlauf says. “Our version of performance is different. Did the ad drive sales? Did it increase leads? Did it get actual humans to take action?”

And here’s the kicker: When brands actually measure performance this way, they see the fraud immediately. “We take a small test budget, $50,000 or $100,000, and suddenly they see 3X, 4X, even 10X return on ad spend. Then they start asking questions—‘Wait, why isn’t this happening with my other buys?’ And that’s when the real intervention happens.”

Wasserlauf thinks we’re getting close. “The thing about marketers is, even though they love the status quo, they love results more,” he says. “Once they see a better way—one that actually drives sales instead of just looking good on a slide deck—they start pushing for change. And when that happens, the industry has no choice but to follow.”

But will it happen fast enough? “If we don’t fix this now, AI is going to take ad fraud from billions to trillions,” he warns. “We’re standing at the edge of a cliff, and marketers need to wake up before they get pushed off.”

The ad industry loves to talk about the future, but if we’re being honest, most of that talk is just fear-masking hype. AI is going to change everything, but will it fix ad tech’s fraud problem or send it into a full-blown trillion-dollar scam factory? Matt Wasserlauf has a pretty clear opinion on that.

“If we don’t fix this now,” he says, “AI is going to take ad fraud from billions to trillions. We’re at a tipping point, and if we don’t get transparency under control, it’s going to be game over for digital advertising as we know it.”

While most ad execs are terrified of AI eating their jobs (or exposing just how little value they actually add), Wasserlauf sees it differently. “AI is an incredibly powerful tool, but it needs guardrails,” he says. “That’s where blockchain comes in. It keeps everything accountable.”

His vision?

Right now, the old guard is still fighting it—but Wasserlauf knows that’s not going to last. “We’re already seeing layoffs, consolidations, and a whole lot of panic,” he says. “Everyone is talking about IPG and Omnicom merging, and you’re seeing a lot of reshuffling at the big four.”

The temperature is changing, and marketers who actually care about results are taking notice. “Advertisers are waking up and realizing, ‘Hey, maybe I shouldn’t just blindly trust that my media buy is reaching real people,’” Wasserlauf says. “Once they start asking the hard questions, the whole house of cards starts to collapse.”

Wasserlauf is not waiting for the industry to get its act together. “We’re moving forward,” he says. “We’re proving every day that this works. We’re helping clients get real performance, not just vanity metrics.”

The real question? Will the ad industry finally demand real accountability, or will they cling to their outdated ways until AI completely outpaces them?

His prediction: “It’s going to be cataclysmic for the companies that refuse to evolve. And honestly? They brought it on themselves.”

Let’s talk about adtech transparency—or, rather, the complete and utter lack of it. The industry’s elite have mastered the art of making billions vanish into thin air while serving you a plate of excuses hotter than a fresh batch of VC funding. So, why are these companies so allergic to sunlight?

The AdTech Mafia isn’t a single, shadowy organization—it's more like a loose syndicate of the usual suspects who thrive on the industry's dysfunction. These are the guys who need adtech to stay broken because they make money off inefficiency, fraud, and complexity.

The AdTech Mafia isn’t just a problem—it’s the reason programmatic remains a Wild West where opacity and inefficiency rule. If the industry really wanted to fix it, these guys would be out of a job.

Translation: If we tell you how we do things, you'll realize we're basically running a glorified slot machine.

Translation: It’s not that we don’t want to explain it—we just know you’ll need a PhD in B.S. to understand the convoluted mess we created to justify our existence.

Translation: AI is the future, but let’s keep it just opaque enough so you can’t question why your ad budget mysteriously evaporates.

Translation: We’re protecting your data from you. But don’t worry, we’ll still share it with the highest bidder.

Translation: If we told you how much we actually take, you’d flip the table faster than a bad poker hand.

Translation: Real-time bidding is super complicated. So complicated, in fact, that we use it as an excuse to avoid showing you the receipts.

Translation: We've been getting away with this for decades, so why stop now?

Translation: We make sure you need us more than a caffeine addict needs their morning fix.

How long will advertisers keep paying for mystery meat media buys before demanding some actual visibility? The walls are closing in, regulators are circling, and sooner or later, even the most clueless CMOs will start asking, "Wait... where exactly did my ad dollars go?"

The adtech world is built on trust issues, data smoke screens, and a whole lot of shrug emojis. But advertisers? They’re starting to wake up. And when they do, some of these adtech darlings might find themselves on the wrong side of history—or a Senate hearing.

Let’s talk about transparency—or the lack thereof. Big platforms and agencies love to throw out numbers that make them look good, but let’s be real: most of these “metrics” are carefully crafted PR moves, not actual transparency. Here’s the breakdown:

📊 Media Math Gymnastics
Large platforms (👀 Facebook, Google, Amazon) dominate 65% of the digital ad market and have a huge incentive to prove their ads work—while conveniently burying data that might show organic investments are just as effective.

🏢 Bureaucracy Loves Secrets
Big agencies? They’ve got layers upon layers of approvals, red tape, and internal politics that make meaningful transparency nearly impossible. By the time someone gets an answer, it’s already irrelevant.

🔎 Limited Visibility = More Control
The industry standard ensures only a select few have access to real data—because when information is power, the bigger players hoard it like it’s gold.

📉 Smaller Vendors Get the Short End
This lack of transparency benefits the biggest fish in the pond, leaving smaller vendors and suppliers fighting blindfolded for scraps.

⚡ Small Agencies: The Underdog Advantage
While big agencies drown in meetings about meetings, smaller shops move fast, build deeper client relationships, and actually listen to feedback—things their bloated competitors can’t execute at scale.

💸 Advertisers’ Three Biggest Fears
1️⃣ Media rebates (aka, “We got a better deal but didn’t tell you”)
2️⃣ Programmatic fees (aka, “You’re paying for things you don’t understand”)
3️⃣ Data ownership (aka, “Whose first-party data is it anyway?”)

🧐 Benchmarks vs. Reality
Many brands don’t even get the reports they need for optimization. Instead, they’re handed generic benchmarks, rather than real, brand-specific KPIs. Spoiler: That’s not how data-driven marketing should work.

🚀 The Takeaway?
Big agencies and platforms have every reason to keep things murky. Smaller agencies, on the other hand, can win by flipping the script—radical transparency might just be their biggest competitive advantage.