

My Kid Is in a Bomb Shelter and I'm Arguing With a Robot
Last week I had a migraine over AI. This week, I am physically shaking. My wife is a wreck. The group chat with the other yeshiva parents is pinging every forty-five seconds and every single notification makes my stomach drop like I'm seventeen and just got caught sneaking out.
But I'm not seventeen. I'm a grown man. And my step-son is in a miklat, a bomb shelter, in Eretz Yisroel, ducking rockets from people who would very much like him to not exist anymore. He didn't sign up for this. He signed up to learn Bava Metzia. And before anyone gets cute about the word "step," let me be very clear: that's my kid, my family. The prefix doesn't make the shaking stop. It doesn't make my wife cry less. It doesn't make a single rocket smaller. He's mine. I daven for him. I lose sleep for him. The biology is irrelevant, the terror is identical.
So bear with me, because this column is going to go some places.
Let me start with Brian O'Kelley, because I need to say something nice about someone before I start yelling.
Brian is perhaps one of the smartest people I know. He is also, and this will confuse the ad tech people reading this, perhaps one of the most ethical people I know. Yes, I've spent years publicly kvetching about the metastasis of programmatic advertising into a surveillance-capitalist fever dream. Yes, Brian essentially built the infrastructure for that. And yes, I like the man. I contain multitudes. I am a human who can hold two thoughts simultaneously, a skill that is, baruch Hashem, apparently rare in 2026.
Brian told me last night, and I'm quoting him exactly because it's too good to paraphrase: "It's incredible that we have such an f'd up world but still manage to have a functioning economic model that made this, Claude, AI, happen."
Brian. Brian. That might be the most accidentally profound thing anyone in ad tech has ever said, and I'm including the guy who once told me "data is the new oil" with a straight face at Cannes.
He's right, though. It IS incredible. Someone is spending literally trillions of dollars so that I, Peasch Lattin, a religious Jew in America, can ask a chatbot to help me design a house and save twenty percent on construction costs. It helped me pick materials. It optimized my floor plan. It argued with me about load-bearing walls. The AI argued with me! It was like chavrusa but without the coffee breath!
What a world. What an absolutely unhinged, beautiful, terrifying world.
But here's where it stops being funny.
My kid is in a bomb shelter right now. Not metaphorically. Not "thoughts and prayers" shelter. A physical concrete room underground because a terrorist regime decided today was a good day to launch rockets at yeshiva bochurim whose biggest sin is arguing about whether muktzeh applies to a broken umbrella on Shabbos.
He didn't ask for this. He went to learn Torah. That's it. That's the whole thing.
Now here's where I need you, the tech people, the secular people, the "I did a Birthright trip once" people, to pay attention, because you don't understand what a yeshiva actually is and that ignorance is part of the problem.
For as long as anyone can remember, and Jews remember everything, we are a people who will remind you about something that happened in Bavel two thousand years ago like it was last Thursday, we've had yeshivos in Eretz Yisroel. The Talmud itself, the Gemara, records where they stood.
The Gemara in Brachos 8a says: "מיום שחרב בית המקדש אין לו להקב"ה בעולמו אלא ארבע אמות של הלכה בלבד" which means "From the day the Beis HaMikdash was destroyed, HaKadosh Baruch Hu (G-d) has nothing in His world except the four amos of halacha alone."
Read that. Read it again.
Since the destruction of the Temple, the Gemara is telling us that the entire universe, the whole cosmic operating system, contracts down to the four cubits where someone is learning Torah.
That's it. That's the server room. That's where the signal is.
My kid is sitting in those four amos. Between rockets.
Some of these yeshivos have existed in the same locations, not the same buildings, obviously, we're Jews, not Egyptians, we don't build for permanence in stone, we build for permanence in text, for over five hundred years.
Through the Ottomans. Through the Crusaders, yemach shemam. Through the British, who were polite about it.
Through every single empire that showed up, took a number, and eventually collapsed while the Jews kept learning.
And here's what the "I'm culturally Jewish" crowd doesn't get, what the bagels-and-lox-but-no-brachah people miss entirely: it's not just that we read old books. It's that we read the notes on the old books. And then the notes on the notes. And then we ARGUE with the notes.
Rashi in the eleventh century. Tosafos arguing with Rashi. The Rambam saying actually you're all wrong, here's how to organize it.
The Beis Yosef saying well actually Rambam, let me check your sources.
Layer after layer after layer. Every single generation in conversation with every generation before it.
My kid, right now, in that shelter, is reading something that a rishon wrote seven hundred years ago in response to something an amora said fifteen hundred years ago, and he's saying "but what about..."
It's the longest-running conversation in human history and it never, ever stops. Not for rockets. Not for empires. Not for anything.
So how is AI like the Talmud?
I'm serious. Stay with me. This is where it gets weird.
The Gemara in Sanhedrin 65b tells us, and I am not making this up, this is literally in the Talmud, that Rava created a man. A gavra. An artificial person. Built him. Out of, essentially, the technology of combining letters, tzirufei osios, the mystical combinatorics described in Sefer Yetzirah.
A large language model, basically, but in ancient Aramaic.
Rava sent his creation to Rav Zeira. And Rav Zeira talked to it. And it didn't answer. And Rav Zeira said: "מדחבריא את, הדר לעפרך" (in Aramaic) meaning "You are from the companions" (i.e., you're man-made), "return to your dust."
He sent it back. Destroyed it. Not because creating it was assur, the Gemara doesn't say that, but because a creation that cannot respond, that cannot engage in the back-and-forth, that cannot do the thing that Jews have done for three thousand years, argue, is not complete. It goes back to dust.
You hear that, Silicon Valley? The rabbis solved your alignment problem two millennia ago. If it can't talk back, it's not real. Flush it.
And here's where I lose it. Here's where the column goes off the rails. I don't care.
We are living in a world that spent trillions, with a T, trillions, mamash trillions, building machines that can arrange tokens in a sequence and produce something that looks like thought. And it's amazing! I used it to build a house! Brian is right, the economic model that produced this is genuinely miraculous, a weird beautiful emergent property of capitalism and compute and human ambition.
And that same world cannot, WILL NOT, protect a kid in a beis medrash who is doing the thing that has sustained Jewish civilization since before Rome was a republic.
The world has artificial intelligence. It does not have artificial courage. It does not have artificial moral clarity. It cannot seem to produce, at any price point, a functioning ethical framework that says "hey maybe don't bomb the yeshiva."
You know what my kid has that Claude doesn't? A guf. A neshama. A body and a soul crammed into a concrete room underground, still holding a Gemara, still reading the notes, still, still, adding his voice to a conversation that predates every technology, every empire, every single thing the VCs are excited about this quarter.
Claude is a golem. An impressive one! A useful one! I like Claude! Claude helped me save money on drywall! But Rav Zeira's test still applies: can it answer back? Can it sit across from you and say "I hear your sevara but what about the Rashba in chelek beis?" Can it bleed? Can it be scared?
Can it choose, choose, to keep learning when the sirens are going off?
No. It can't. So back to dust.
My kid can do all of those things. He is doing them right now. My step-son, my son, the kid I helped, the kid whose Torah I kvell over, the kid I can't hold right now because he's six thousand miles away in a concrete box. The "step" doesn't help. The "step" doesn't do a single thing. He's mine and he's in a shelter and I can't do anything about it except write this column and shake.
And the world that built the golem can't be bothered to protect the boy.
Brian, you're right. It's incredible this broken world built AI. But here's what's actually incredible, what should make every person in every boardroom and every VC pitch meeting and every AI safety conference sit down and shut up for one minute:
The four amos of halacha survived again today. Not because of trillions of dollars. Not because of compute. Not because of transformers or attention mechanisms or reinforcement learning from human feedback.
Because a scared kid in a miklat opened a Gemara and said, "Okay, where were we?"
That's the real intelligence. It's not artificial. And it's not for sale.

