You know the type. The pitch deck peacocks. The “strategic” consultants who can’t define CPM.

The media buyers who swear their campaign is “optimized” but can’t explain the funnel. They’re quoting ADOTAT+ on calls like they thought of it themselves.

Because we don’t just break news—we expose it, dissect it, and serve it raw with receipts. Vendor drama? We’ve got the texts. Ad tech fraud? We name names. Holding company whispers? We’ve already heard them scream.

This isn’t a newsletter. It’s a crowbar for prying open the black box of this industry.

If you’d rather skip the recycled LinkedIn threads and get to the part where you actually know what you’re talking about, join ADOTAT+. Or don’t—and let your competitor use our reporting to crush your next pitch.

🧠 Stay Bold. Stay Curious. Know More than You Did Yesterday.
👉 [Subscribe to ADOTAT+] — And stop pretending you “heard it first.”

If you still think PubMatic is the plumbing under the programmatic sink, you’ve been asleep at the wheel—or worse, you’ve been spoon-fed by some DSP rep still living off their 2018 deck.

This isn’t some faceless widget company quietly piping auctions. PubMatic is pitching itself as the indie counterweight to the giants: a full-stack, AI-driven, open-web alternative to Magnite’s Frankenstein empire, OpenX’s clean-but-comfortable niche, and the Godzilla landlord that is Google Ad Manager.

And here’s the kicker: they’re actually profitable. Not “we promise we’ll get there in Q4” profitable. We’re talking 37 consecutive quarters in the black, no debt, and a private cloud they own down to the screws. That last part isn’t just nerdy infrastructure trivia—it’s the spine of their whole story.

No AWS bills. No kissing Google Cloud’s ring. Just racks of servers they can tune like a Formula 1 car. In a world where rivals are bleeding margin to Big Tech’s servers, PubMatic is bragging about cutting costs per million impressions by 20% while processing 78 trillion impressions in a single quarter. Translation: their moat isn’t software; it’s steel, wires, and electricity bills they actually control.

Magnite stitched itself together through acquisitions and called it omnichannel. Yes, they’ve got muscle in CTV, but when you build an empire by bolting on parts, you also inherit every integration migraine known to man. It works—until the seams start showing.

OpenX doesn’t make the loud headlines, but give them credit: they’ve carved out a reputation for clean tech, sustainability, and simplicity. They’re a steady partner for buyers who want reliability over flash. The issue? They’re not charging into CTV the way PubMatic and Magnite are. Solid, yes. Dominant, no.

And then there’s the landlord. Google owns the building, the lease, the pipes, the utilities, and will charge you for every flickering lightbulb. They’re the incumbent superpower, and everyone else—PubMatic included—is basically renting space on the block.

PubMatic’s pitch against this backdrop is simple: We’re independent. We’re transparent. We can move fast without asking corporate permission. Whether that’s enough to pry agencies off their Google addiction? We’ll see.

Everyone in programmatic knows buyers are overpaying because of too many middlemen. Most SSPs treat SPO like it’s optional—something to put in the RFP but never enforce. PubMatic, on the other hand, claims 55% of its activity already runs through SPO.

If true, that’s more than a side initiative. That’s a new operating system. And thanks to their private infrastructure, they say they can execute it faster and cheaper. Milliseconds shaved off auctions means more wins. Lower costs per impression means they can undercut rivals while telling agencies they’re “saving money.”

Of course, agencies love to say they want transparency, but let’s be honest: half the time they just want plausible deniability. Still, if PubMatic is making SPO their religion, it’s a gutsy move—and it may be the one thing that separates them from the herd.

While the open web is still sobbing over cookies, PubMatic is focused on the land that actually matters: video and CTV. Omnichannel video is up 34% year-over-year, and CTV alone is up 50% year-over-year, now representing 20% of their revenue.

Premium video CPMs are still worth something, unlike open-web display, which has been pummeled into penny-stock territory. Magnite still has the stronger exclusives, sure, but PubMatic is leaning into curated marketplaces that are fraud-free, premium, and actually usable for brands.

And for live events? PubMatic claims their private cloud won’t buckle when the NFL drives traffic into the stratosphere. Meanwhile, rivals still pray AWS doesn’t go down mid-game. If true, that’s not just efficiency—that’s survival.

PubMatic never shuts up about their infrastructure because it’s their real weapon. Owning the pipes gives them advantages rivals can’t replicate without a decade of pain:

And with AI workloads exploding, they’re betting this becomes even more valuable. Their in-house AI tools—predictive diagnostics, dynamic pricing, and even GenAI media-buying toys—sit on top of this backbone. Whether those AI buzzwords are more than investor catnip remains to be seen, but the infrastructure edge is real.

PubMatic isn’t just renaming dashboards and calling it innovation. They’re betting big on three post-cookie products:

Together, they make up 8% of revenue, doubling year-over-year. It’s not AWS money, but it’s more than vaporware. In adtech, “emerging revenue” usually means a flashy slide in a pitch deck. PubMatic can actually point to real dollars.

For too long, DSPs have been the Uber drivers of targeting—burning gas, missing turns, and billing you anyway. PubMatic’s idea is to flip the model: keep the targeting closer to publishers, keep the data in-house, and stop paying tolls on every turn.

It’s not revolutionary—it’s basically how media buying was supposed to work all along. But paired with profitability, SPO, and their private infrastructure, it might finally be more than a PR slogan.

Here’s the real test: can PubMatic turn all this into agency must-buy status before Magnite gobbles up every CTV exclusive and Google tightens its landlord grip?

Because independence is great. Profitability is great. Servers you own are great. But none of it matters if agencies still default to the comfortable giants.

PubMatic has built the racetrack. Now they need to convince the drivers to show up.

And that’s the indie SSP’s biggest gamble: you can build the best pipes in the industry—but if nobody wants to run water through them, you’re just a very expensive plumbing store.

PubMatic doesn’t just want you to see them as another SSP trying to cling to relevance. Their pitch is loftier: we’re the indie lifeline for the open web. A company that claims to bring sanity to a supply chain that has been anything but. They tell publishers, “We’ll help you make more money without giving your data to Google.” They tell advertisers, “We’ll clean up the pipes, cut the middlemen, and give you more bang for your media buck.” They tell agencies, “We’ll be the counterweight to Google’s monopoly without all the lock-in and walled-garden nonsense.”

From 30,000 feet, it works as a story. SPO is supposedly 55%+ of all activity, omnichannel video has grown into nearly half of their revenue mix, and CTV is up more than 50% year-over-year. If you’re a publisher, that means demand for premium video inventory is flowing through their pipes. If you’re a buyer, it suggests campaigns actually clear without disappearing into the black hole of SSP markups. And if you’re an agency, it’s the sort of slide you can use to tell clients, “See, we’re not giving all our money to Google.”

On paper, PubMatic looks like the indie Swiss Army knife: sharp enough to cut the fat, versatile enough to handle every channel, and small enough to claim “we’re on your side.”

Let’s start with publishers, since they’re the ones who have been squeezed the hardest in the adtech ecosystem. PubMatic’s infrastructure story matters here. By owning their private cloud, they say they can process impressions more efficiently, cutting infrastructure costs by 20%. That, in theory, means fewer dollars wasted on compute bills and more flowing back to publishers.

Then there’s Connect — PubMatic’s answer to the crumbling cookie. It lets publishers deliver first-party audience data directly to buyers without leaking it into the open bidstream. If you’re a publisher sitting on data that makes you competitive against Facebook or Google, that’s not a minor perk; that’s survival.

So yes, if you believe the pitch, PubMatic is giving publishers two critical things: higher margins and data control. And in a world where publishers are tired of being the ATM machine everyone else siphons fees from, that’s not a small contribution.

Advertisers have been complaining for a decade that too much of their spend evaporates into middlemen fees. PubMatic’s bet is that by making SPO its religion, not a side project, it can cut out redundant hops and show buyers exactly who is clipping the ticket.

Over 55% of platform activity is SPO, which, if true, means buyers are seeing more impressions delivered for the same dollar. And faster auctions — thanks to their private infrastructure — mean more campaigns win placements that would otherwise go to someone else. That’s the kind of efficiency advertisers always say they want (even if they rarely pressure their agencies to demand it).

And in CTV? Advertisers care less about infrastructure and more about brand safety, fraud, and hitting premium audiences at scale. PubMatic’s growth there — 50% YoY — isn’t just an internal stat; it means advertisers are actually buying into their curated video marketplaces. And unlike much of the open web, premium CTV CPMs still command real money. Advertisers may not love PubMatic, but they like the fact that someone’s building pipes outside of Google.

Agencies have been in an awkward marriage with Google for years. They hate the fees, they hate the lack of transparency, but they love the scale. PubMatic’s independence pitch is a gift to every holding company buyer who wants to go back to clients and say, “See, we diversified.”

Johanna Bauman, PubMatic’s CMO, is still out there pushing the independence + infrastructure gospel hard, and agencies eat that up because it plays well in RFPs. Add in the fact that PubMatic doesn’t lock buyers into proprietary tools the way Google does, and suddenly agencies have leverage.

The problem? Execution. Their head of agency sales, Robin Steinberg, bolted to Index Exchange — not a minor shuffle, but a full-on quarterback switch in the middle of the game. If agencies are going to buy into PubMatic’s independence pitch, they need seasoned people whispering in their ear. Losing Steinberg doesn’t kill the story, but it makes it harder to sell at scale.

This is where PubMatic’s ecosystem halo gets dented.

So does PubMatic help the ecosystem? Yes — but with caveats.

But… the weaknesses matter. Dependence on DV360 undercuts their independence story. No CTV adserver limits leverage. Losing agency-side talent makes the “must-buy” status harder to achieve.

PubMatic wants to be the indie sheriff of the open web, corralling the chaos into something sustainable. Some days, they’re wearing the badge. Other days, they look more like the deputy still waiting for Google to hand them the bullets.