- ADOTAT Newsletter - Adtech, Marketing and Media
- Posts
- The 'Elon Tax' Phenomenon
The 'Elon Tax' Phenomenon
How the Marketing Industry Got Strong-Armed Into Paying Tribute to the King of Chaos

Learn AI in 5 minutes a day
This is the easiest way for a busy person wanting to learn AI in as little time as possible:
Sign up for The Rundown AI newsletter
They send you 5-minute email updates on the latest AI news and how to use it
You learn how to become 2x more productive by leveraging AI
"X? More like Ex."
Judy Shapiro just dropped the kind of truth bomb that Elon Musk’s legal team probably wishes would self-destruct on impact. According to her, not a single brand she works with is crawling back to X on a regular basis. And Musk’s lawsuits? Zero persuasion power.
Turns out, the great advertising exodus from X had exactly zero impact on brands’ bottom lines. No sales drop. No business implosion. Nada. All Musk managed to prove with his bluster is that his ad products are about as essential as a fax machine in 2024.
The only use case left? A quick promotional sprint for a movie, book, or show—fleeting, temporary, and definitely not a long-term endorsement. In other words, brands will rent, but they won’t buy.
Judy Shapiro, CEO of Topic Intelligence.ai, engageSimply.com, and Trust Web Times.com, is just saying the quiet part out loud. X isn’t critical, and Musk’s threats are about as effective as a pop-up ad from 2005.
Why reshoot when you can remaster? Rembrand’s AI Studio lets you drop products into your videos like they were always meant to be there—seamlessly, effortlessly, and without the post-production migraines.
🎬 Creators: Monetize on your terms—no awkward ad breaks, just seamless integrations.
📢 Advertisers: Be part of the story, not an annoying pop-up.
Try it now and you could snag $10,000 (because who doesn’t love free money?).
The High Cost of Defiance: What Happens When Brands Cross Musk?
There was a time when advertisers could make cold, calculated decisions about where to spend their money without worrying about triggering an ego the size of a Tesla Gigafactory. That time is over.
In Elon Musk’s world, advertising isn’t just about reach or engagement—it’s about loyalty. Step out of line, and you don’t just lose a few impressions—you might lose your next merger, your government contracts, or your ability to function as a normal business.
This is Musk’s Protection Racket, and if you’re a brand or agency, you’d better know the rules.
🍎 The Apple Incident: How One Tweet Can Trigger a Tech Feud
Let’s start with Apple, the brand that briefly dared to defy the Musk Industrial Complex—and instantly regretted it.
Back in late 2023, Apple quietly pulled its ad dollars from X after the platform’s content moderation policies—or lack thereof—allowed ads to appear next to antisemitic and extremist content.
Now, in the old world, Apple’s decision would’ve been a routine, PR-friendly move. Brands pause and unpause ad spending all the time. It’s like the “We were on a break” argument, but for marketers.
But Musk? He does not do “breaks.”
Instead of handling the situation with a bit of corporate grace, Musk had a full-scale meltdown—on his own platform, of course.
He accused Apple of hating free speech.
He suggested they were trying to “blackmail” him.
And, in true Muskian fashion, he rage-tweeted that he was “going to war” with the iPhone overlords.
A billionaire throwing a tantrum because a company didn’t want its logo next to conspiracy theories? Peak 2023 energy.
But within weeks, guess what? Apple quietly returned to advertising on X. Why? Because Apple isn’t stupid. Musk made it clear that defying him wasn’t just about losing some ad impressions—it was about losing access, favor, and, possibly, regulatory goodwill.
This wasn’t just a flex—it was a lesson to every other brand watching.
📉 Musk’s Blacklist: When Brands Get Named and Shamed
Apple wasn’t the first brand to get the Musk treatment, and it won’t be the last. Musk has turned advertiser exodus into a public spectacle, making sure that anyone who pulls ad dollars from X isn’t just quietly offloading budget somewhere else—they’re being dragged into the spotlight.
IBM, Disney, and Paramount? He put them on blast when they reduced spending.
L’Oréal and Comcast? He made sure everyone knew they were “part of the problem.”
Apple? We already covered that meltdown.
This isn’t how CEOs typically handle advertiser churn. Normal media executives grovel, send gift baskets, and promise “enhanced brand safety tools” while begging brands to return.
Musk? He treats it like a public execution. Pull your money, and you don’t just lose placement—you get put on the “Enemies of X” list.
That’s why brands aren’t just returning to X—they’re doing it quietly. No press releases. No triumphant announcements. Just a slow trickle of ad dollars back into the system, because Musk has made it clear that walking away isn’t an option.
🏛️ The Regulatory Threat: The Real Reason Brands Are Nervous
This is where it gets even darker. Because it’s not just about Musk publicly shaming advertisers—it’s about what happens behind the scenes.
A lawyer from X reportedly called Interpublic Group (IPG) in December, reminding them that brands should reconsider their ad spend on X—or face “consequences.”
Advertisers who quietly left X are now reportedly being “encouraged” to return—or risk finding themselves on the wrong side of government approvals.
Musk has close ties to the Trump administration, meaning that skipping ad buys on X may no longer just be an advertising decision—it may be a political one.
Brands aren’t just making media buys anymore—they’re making political calculations.
Want to keep your federal contracts? Maybe it’s time to up your X budget.
Need regulatory approval for a merger? Might want to rethink that “brand safety” stance.
Hoping to avoid unnecessary scrutiny? Probably not the best idea to have your CMO publicly dunking on Musk.
This is a whole new world for advertisers. The old rules—where you spent where you got the best engagement, ROI, and audience targeting—are out the window. Now, advertising is a form of protection money.
📌 The Bottom Line: Welcome to the Musk Ad Tax
What Musk has built isn’t just a media platform—it’s a loyalty test.
If you’re in, you get access, influence, and the ability to run your business smoothly.
If you’re out, you get bad press, political headaches, and the nagging feeling that your next big business deal might hit unexpected roadblocks.
Musk didn’t just change the ad industry—he’s holding it hostage. And brands?
They’re paying up.
Musk’s Endgame: Does He Even WANT Ad Money?
Here’s the irony of it all—Elon Musk doesn’t even like advertising. Never has. Never will.
This is a guy who built Tesla into a multi-billion-dollar brand without spending a dime on traditional ads. He’s been openly dismissive of marketing, seeing it as a necessary evil at best and a manipulation game at worst. He has said repeatedly that good products don’t need advertising. And yet, here he is, running a platform that relies on ad dollars to stay afloat.
So why is he even bothering? Why strong-arm agencies, pressure brands, and twist regulatory screws just to get more media dollars flowing into X?
Because, for now, he has to.
X Is Still a Flaming Money Pit
Let’s not forget: Musk didn’t buy Twitter because it was a great business. He bought it because he thought it was a “town square” worth saving, a place where he could flex his power, control the narrative, and entertain himself in the process.
But in doing so, he gutted it.
80% of staff? Fired.
Content moderation? Slashed.
Subscription revenue? A joke.
X has hemorrhaged ad revenue since Musk’s takeover. Sure, some brands are crawling back, but not fast enough to replace what was lost. Even Musk’s biggest fanboys in Silicon Valley would admit that this platform isn’t exactly a goldmine.
And let’s not forget—Musk himself keeps talking about moving away from advertising.
He’s pushing AI tools.
He’s trying to make “X Money” (whatever that is) happen.
He’s still obsessed with turning X into some kind of all-in-one super app.
All of this signals one thing: Musk doesn’t want X to depend on advertising forever. He’s doing what he needs to do now, but in the long run? He’d rather not deal with brand safety complaints, agency politics, or whatever today’s trending outrage is.
The Real Endgame: A World Where He Doesn’t Need Advertisers At All
If Musk had his way, he’d find a way to make X completely independent of ad dollars.
Maybe it’s AI-generated content.
Maybe it’s premium subscriptions.
Maybe it’s crypto, a payments network, or something none of us have even thought of yet.
But for now? He needs ad money to keep this circus running. So he’ll take it—but on his terms.
And if brands don’t like it? Tough.
Musk’s Ultimate Flex: Make Brands Need Him More Than He Needs Them
Right now, advertisers are returning to X because they feel like they have no other option. They’re paying the Elon Tax because they don’t want to risk being on the wrong side of history (or a regulatory decision).
But what happens when Musk no longer needs their money?
That’s when things get really interesting.
If Musk can make X profitable without advertising, he’ll happily tell brands to take a hike.
If he can fund the platform through AI, crypto, or government contracts, he’ll be completely untouchable.
And if he no longer needs ad buyers, he’ll have even more freedom to shape X however he wants—without worrying about PR tantrums from big brands.
So while agencies and CMOs are playing the short game, trying to figure out whether to buy more X inventory this quarter, Musk is playing the long game.
He’s not just trying to fix X’s ad business—he’s trying to make it irrelevant.
And if he pulls that off? That’s when he wins.
🚨 The Trump Factor: Why This Got So Much Messier
Ad spend used to be simple. Just a line item on the budget, a couple of clicks and you’re done. 💼 Easy, right? Well, not anymore.
The second Trump waltzed back into the White House, it’s like someone hit the reset button. Suddenly, your ad spend’s got political consequences. 🧳
Enter Elon Musk: The Rule Rewriter
And then there's Elon Musk. 🚀 He's not just participating in the game—he’s out there rewriting the playbook. 📝 Advertisers now have to ask themselves, Where are we putting our money? And what kind of political baggage comes with that choice?
Rest’s in the paid section—keep reading to dive deeper.