
đ The Flywheel Trap: Why Amazonâs 77% Market Share Isnât Just a Number
eMarketer dropped a new report this week, and buried inside the upbeat language and growth curves was a stat that should make any non-Amazon retailer spit out their cold brew: Amazon will hold 77% of the retail media marketânow and in 2028.
Thatâs not a blip.
Thatâs a gravitational event.
A strategic black hole. And everyone else? You're just floating debris hoping not to get pulled in.
This isnât just dominance. Itâs design.
Amazonâs 77% market share in retail media isnât some accidental outcomeâitâs a strategic gravity well that pulls in dollars, data, suppliers, and customers like a Dyson on steroids. Drew Cashmore called it a âflywheel,â and heâs right. Every dollar Amazon earns gets reinvested across logistics, ad innovation, customer experience, and even pricing power. Itâs the opposite of zero-sum. Itâs exponential. The more they make, the more they pull aheadâand the harder it becomes for anyone else to even stay in the race.
Meanwhile, the rest of retail is frantically hot-gluing their own âmedia networksâ together, praying for incremental margins and maybe a few trade dollars. It's like showing up to a Formula 1 race in a golf cart powered by vibes and optimism.
Cashmore laid it out: even as retailers scramble to build their own flywheels, Amazonâs head start is almost unfair. Theyâve got an obscene synergy machineâfirst-party data, same-day shipping, customer obsession, ad tech so advanced it might be sentient. Walmart's trying to keep up with an omnichannel strategy and some clever in-store activation, and good on them. But the fragmentation of the rest of the space makes it laughably hard for brands to manage multiple platforms. Spoiler alert: they wonât.
This market will consolidate. Harsh, but true. Cashmore predicts only a handful of playersâAmazon obviously among themâwill survive this round of retail media musical chairs. Everyone else will either get absorbed, partner up, or quietly fade out while muttering about âQ4 headwinds.â
Now letâs talk about the small fish. If you're not Amazon or Walmart, you're basically fighting over Amazonâs table scraps:
Amazon takes 77%. Walmart takes 8%. That leaves 15% for everyone else. Thatâs not market share, itâs a consolation prize.
Smaller retailers are often dependent on Amazon just to access customers, which is like renting space from your biggest competitor.
Brand identity? Visibility? Direct relationships? Amazon eats that tooâyour product is in their store, under their rules, playing their game.
And if you want to build your own media network? Good luck finding the budget to hire a single competent ad ops team, let alone build a DSP.
Now, to be fair, itâs not all doomscrolling. There are openings:
Best Buy has carved out a profitable niche by going all-in on tech audiences.
Some smaller players are building real muscle through smart third-party partnershipsâthink The Trade Desk, TransUnion, etc.
And interestingly, Amazon opening its ad tech to other retailers could weirdly end up empowering the same rivals it dominates⌠if theyâre smart enough to use it without getting swallowed in the process.
But letâs be honest here. Amazonâs flywheel is no longer a clever metaphor. Itâs a closed-loop ecosystem of commerce, content, and advertising thatâs self-reinforcing and brutally efficient. It sucks oxygen out of the roomâand most retailers are left gasping for ad dollars while pretending their âconnected retail experienceâ is enough to stay relevant.
Hereâs what Iâm watching next:
How Amazon reinvests every penny to widen the moat
How supplier trade budgets shift away from smaller players
Why âcatching upâ isnât a strategyâitâs a bedtime story retailers tell themselves
Weâre not at the end of the retail media game, but we are well past halftime. The next few quarters? Bloodbath.
Stay bold. Stay curious. And build something Amazon canât copy.


