In partnership with
Get Booked on 3.8 Million Podcasts Automatically
Stop wasting time – 2025 is going by fast. If you finally want to be a regular podcast guest in your industry, PodPitch.com will make it happen. Even the beehiiv team uses it!
Imagine snapping your fingers & getting booked on the exact podcasts your customers are already listening to…
With PodPitch.com, it takes 60 secs to start emailing tons of podcast hosts to pitch YOU as the perfect next guest.
Sync your email address
Load in your brand info
Click "go"
Now, you've just automated thousands of personalized emails pitching YOU as the PERFECT next podcast guest. Sit back and relax as you watch the emails send out from your email address.
Big brands like Feastables, Jack Links, and hundreds more are already using PodPitch.com instead of expensive PR agencies.
PodPitch.com is so confident in their tech that they'll give you a FREE Starbucks gift card if PodPitch.com isn't the most impressive 20 minute demo you've ever seen.
Ready to make 2025 your year?
ADOTAT+ EDITION
You're one of the exclusive 150 who get the PAID edition of ADOTAT. Not some random freebie email blasted out to the masses—you’re in the club. See those green dots? That’s the premium content, reserved for our ADOTAT+ readers. If you’re cruising on a free trial or enjoying a month on us, soak it in and savor just how top-shelf this really is.
This is what being in the know feels like.
Our Amazing Sponsor
Table of Contents
Ah, curation. The latest shiny buzzword in ad tech, trotted out with the same feverish enthusiasm as a new diet fad that promises you can eat an entire cake and still lose weight. It's being sold as the magic bullet for programmatic advertising’s inefficiencies—a way to clean up the supply chain, reduce waste, and make advertising more effective.
The problem? Like every “too good to be true” solution, curation is rapidly becoming just another tool for middlemen to extract rent while doing the digital equivalent of moving peas around a plate. It’s the latest reinvention of arbitrage, where some players are truly innovating, and others are just relabeling the same old tricks with a higher markup.
If you believe the hype, curation is about transparency, efficiency, and control. If you look closer, it’s starting to look suspiciously like a rebranded paywall for inventory that advertisers already had access to. It’s a shell game where the only thing that’s changing is who gets to pocket the extra fees. So, let’s separate the actual innovators from the arbitrage artists and see who’s bringing real value to the table and who’s just taxing the system.
WTF Is Curation, Really?
Curation was supposed to be the white-glove, concierge-level upgrade that finally fixed programmatic advertising.
Think Michelin-star precision—every impression hand-selected, ethically sourced, and served on a gleaming silver platter of data intelligence. Instead, what we’ve got is more like a sketchy pop-up “tasting menu” where the chef is just microwaving last week’s leftovers and hoping you don’t notice.
In the grand utopian vision, curation is the solution to programmatic’s longest-running disaster movie:
✔ Audience Intelligence – Smarter, privacy-compliant targeting that doesn’t rely on third-party cookies like an aging influencer clinging to expired brand deals.
✔ Supply Chain Transparency – No shady resellers quietly siphoning your media budget like a corrupt accountant cooking the books. No MFA (Made-for-Advertising) sludge masquerading as premium content, hoping to pass as legitimate before you wise up.
✔ More Control for Publishers – A world where publishers actually see the money instead of watching a parade of intermediaries take their cut like a conga line of wedding crashers raiding the open bar.
In theory, this should mean better, cleaner, more effective advertising. You know, a world where your budget actually delivers value instead of evaporating like a VC-backed startup with a terrible burn rate. But here’s where it gets fun: not all curation is actually curating. Some companies are genuinely trying to build a better programmatic ecosystem—meticulously engineering smarter, more transparent supply paths. Others? They’re just slapping a “premium” sticker on the same tired inventory and marking up the price like a gas stat
Mike Treon at PMG on Curation:
We spoke with Mike Treon, Head of Data Strategy at PMG, about the evolving role of curation in programmatic advertising. He emphasized that true curation must go beyond buzzwords and consider both quality data and quality inventory to create real value across the ecosystem.
"I think curation really needs to take into account both quality data and quality inventory. We've been curating inventory for years, building good, diversified, and optimized supply paths to publishers and consumers, and a strong curation strategy in the vein of the buzz now needs to include this."
Treon pointed out that many current curation efforts focus heavily on organization, monetization, and consolidation, often benefiting publishers, data vendors, and agencies—but missing the bigger picture.
"There are a lot of curation opportunities that focus on organization, monetization, and consolidation—mainly for the benefit of publishers, data vendors, and agencies. In order to really consider the whole system, we need to consider the value economics for both supply and demand and leverage curation to activate unique and proprietary data alongside smartly curated supply."
He cautioned against the overuse of audience and metadata-enabled PMPs, which often just increase audience availability without truly refining the ad experience or driving meaningful results.
"We need to avoid the buzz of adding and distributing audience and metadata-enabled PMPs that simply enhance the availability of an audience."
Treon's take highlights a growing sentiment in adtech: Curation isn’t just about repackaging supply; it’s about ensuring the right mix of data, inventory, and economics to drive actual performance.
Curation: Who’s Innovating and Who’s Just Running a Vegas-Style Racket?
If you’re trying to figure out who’s actually delivering value in the curation space and who’s just skimming from the top like a Vegas casino with a rigged blackjack table, here’s your definitive cheat sheet. Because, let’s be honest, not all curation is created equal.
Some players legitimately enhance advertising efficiency, providing data-driven precision that improves campaign performance. Others? They’re dressed-up arbitrage shops, adding absolutely nothing except another line item on your invoice and a smug press release about how they’re "revolutionizing" ad buying.
So, who’s actually making the programmatic ecosystem better, and who’s just shaking advertisers down for their lunch money? Let’s break it down.
1️⃣ The Real Innovators: The Ones Who Actually Do Something Useful
These are the companies that actually add intelligence to the process. Not just in the “we ran a few SQL queries and called it AI” way, but in a real, scalable, measurable way that improves campaign outcomes.
Here’s what sets them apart:
✅ They have real first-party data. Not some stitched-together, third-hand, pre-GDPR “audience graph” that’s about as fresh as a month-old bagel. Actual, privacy-compliant, valuable data that makes targeting smarter and more efficient.
✅ They use machine learning for more than just a buzzword. If a company can’t explain how their AI actually works without sounding like they copied it from a ChatGPT prompt, they’re probably faking it. The real innovators use actual predictive analytics, dynamic pricing models, and real-time audience intelligence to make ad buying smarter.
✅ They optimize the supply path. This means eliminating waste, cutting out resellers, and reducing the dreaded ad tech tax. They’re not just bundling together random websites and calling it “premium” like some glorified digital coupon book.
✅ They actually improve performance. And here’s the kicker: they have the receipts to prove it. Not just vague charts in a sales deck, but actual case studies that show higher ROI, better audience engagement, and lower costs per acquisition.
This is the difference between a real chef who sources the best ingredients and an overpriced catering service that reheats frozen chicken and calls it gourmet.
These companies? They’re actually making programmatic advertising work better.
2️⃣ The Pretenders: The Ones Who Add Fees But Not Value
And now we get to the snake oil salesmen. The ones who talk a big game about how they’re “solving programmatic inefficiencies” when all they’re really doing is adding a premium to inventory that was already available in the open market.
These are the folks who, five years ago, were hawking third-party data marketplaces that turned out to be about as reliable as a timeshare presentation in Florida. Now that cookies are crumbling and advertisers are panicking, they’ve pivoted to curation—which, for them, means relabeling the same junk inventory, slapping on a 20% fee, and hoping no one asks too many questions.
Here’s how to spot them:
❌ They don’t actually own any meaningful data. If their “first-party data” consists of scraped bidstream signals and some cookie-based segments from 2018, run.
❌ They have no real optimization technology. If all they’re doing is stuffing inventory into a DSP with a “curated” label, that’s not innovation—it’s just a repackaging fee.
❌ Their supply path is a mystery. If you have no idea how your money is flowing and where your ad is actually being served, that’s a sign they’re just skimming off the top while reselling whatever they can get their hands on.
❌ They make vague promises with zero transparency. If a company claims to be improving ad performance but can’t show real lift in engagement, conversion rates, or cost efficiency, they’re just throwing glitter on a pile of ad tech sludge and calling it gold.
These are the same players who once told brands third-party data was the future. Then when that didn’t work, they pivoted to brand safety solutions. Then contextual targeting. Now curation. See a pattern?
They’re not here to fix advertising. They’re here to keep collecting fees.
Who’s Actually Doing Curation Right?
COMPANY PROFILE
Audigent: The Powerhouse with Real Data Muscle
Let’s talk about Audigent, because if there’s one company in the curation space that actually deserves the hype, it’s them. Unlike the wannabe curation shops that just slap a new label on the same old inventory and hope no one asks questions, Audigent is actually doing the work.
While most so-called curation providers are effectively reselling the same programmatic soup at a premium, Audigent is cooking up something entirely different—and it’s a five-star meal, not a reheated frozen dinner from the discount aisle. They’re not just bundling websites together and calling it “premium”—they’re reengineering how ad buying works, using real intelligence, first-party data, and advanced machine learning to make campaigns actually perform.
Now, thanks to Experian’s massive data ecosystem, Audigent has something that most of their competitors can only dream of:
📊 Access to some of the most valuable consumer intelligence in the industry.
🔬 The ability to optimize audience targeting in ways that actually matter.
💰 A curation model that isn’t just a cash grab, but a legitimate value-add for advertisers.
This isn’t just about renaming the same programmatic nonsense and calling it a day. This is actual innovation—the kind that fixes real problems instead of just creating new ones to charge you extra for.
So, What Makes Audigent Actually Different?
Let’s break it down.
🔹 Dynamic Pricing – Because Advertisers Deserve Better Than a Fixed Menu of Overpriced Junk
One of Audigent’s superpowers is its ability to optimize pricing dynamically. Most SSPs and so-called “curation providers” operate like a rigged auction house, where advertisers either overpay for garbage inventory or lose bids to resellers who have inflated the price beyond all reason.
Audigent fixes that.
Instead of letting resellers and arbitrage players dictate pricing, they use actual market intelligence and predictive analytics to ensure that advertisers are paying the right price for the right inventory—nothing more, nothing less.
🚫 No more bidding against yourself in a mystery auction where you never really know what you’re getting.
🚫 No more watching your budget disappear into the black hole of “platform fees” and “optimization costs.”
🚫 No more paying premium prices for ad slots that would barely qualify as background noise.
With Audigent’s dynamic pricing engine, advertisers aren’t getting scammed into overpaying for low-value placements. They’re getting intelligent, optimized pricing that ensures they actually win when it matters.
🔹 Real-Time Audience Intelligence – Targeting That’s Smarter, Not Just Louder
Let’s be honest: most targeting solutions in ad tech are about as accurate as a weather forecast from a psychic.
For years, advertisers relied on third-party cookies and creaky old data sets that could barely predict what someone was interested in yesterday, let alone right now.
Audigent throws all of that nonsense out the window and replaces it with real-time audience intelligence that’s actually worth something.
Instead of guessing based on outdated behavioral data, Audigent uses real, privacy-compliant, first-party data signals to match ads to the right people at the right time.
💡 What does this mean in practice? It means that advertisers aren’t spraying and praying their way through programmatic buys, hoping something sticks. It means ads actually reach relevant consumers instead of ending up in front of bots, click farms, and people who couldn’t care less about the product.
✔️ No third-party cookies required.
✔️ No garbage “audience segments” that were built in 2017 and haven’t been updated since.
✔️ No wild guesses based on the digital equivalent of tea leaves.
This is real audience targeting. The kind that moves the needle instead of just checking a box
Multilocal: Bringing Localized Intelligence to Global Buyers
Another company doing curation right? Multilocal. Instead of playing inventory musical chairs, they specialize in bringing localized, high-quality media to buyers who actually want it. That means:
✔️ A real commitment to supply path efficiency (not just another excuse to add fees).
✔️ Strategic partnerships with high-value publishers who actually create quality content.
✔️ More transparency, less mystery—you actually know what you’re buying instead of taking a blind leap of faith into the programmatic abyss.
They aren’t just selling you back your own media buys like some of the less scrupulous curation companies do. They’re making advertising better, not just more expensive.
The “Curation-First” Mystery Business (In My Opinion)
Ah yes, yet another ad tech company that’s reinvented itself more times than a washed-up rock band trying to stay relevant. One day, they’re monetization experts. The next, performance optimization specialists. And now? They’ve suddenly decided they’re a “curation-first” SSP.
Which, in my opinion, is adorable. Except there’s one small problem: no one seems to know what they actually do.
Are they an SSP?
Are they just reselling other people’s inventory and calling it a business?
Are they an ops house that rebranded to ride the curation wave?
Depends on who you ask. And that’s exactly the issue.
Here’s what I do know: Curation requires first-party data. It requires real technology, real machine learning, and actual premium inventory. And in my opinion, this company has none of that. What they do seem to have is a solid knack for rebranding and charging a markup on the same inventory that was already available.
It’s arbitrage with extra steps. Take existing programmatic supply, slap a “curated” label on it, add a fee, and sell it back to advertisers as if it’s some kind of premium offering. Like taking boxed wine, pouring it into a decanter, and charging $200 a glass.
For transparency: I tried to address these concerns directly. I had an interview scheduled with their CEO to talk about their model and their role in the industry. But, as luck would have it, she canceled at the last minute, claiming she was essentially on her deathbed in a hospital—and then disappeared.
Now, I’m not saying medical emergencies don’t happen. But when someone ghosts entirely after being asked real questions about their business model, let’s just say it raises a few questions.
And because the fun never stops, let’s talk about another wrinkle. One of their C-level executives and I have history. Specifically, I believe he stole money from me. Twice. (He, of course, would strongly disagree.)
As a note, I have a glowing review from him, a letter of recommendation from one of those ventures, where he called me one of the most ethical people in marketing. I waited until he sent me that letter to ask for my money.
Now, to be fully transparent, I’m not naming the company outright because of this past connection—I don’t need anyone crying “bias” when, frankly, the facts speak for themselves. But make no mistake: in my opinion, this is still complete BS.
The “Curation-First” Mystery Business (In My Opinion)
If you were hoping for a happy ending in the Great Curation Fairytale, here’s your reality check: publishers are once again getting fleeced—except this time, it’s under the guise of “innovation.”
Ad tech promised them higher CPMs, better monetization, and more control over their own inventory. Instead, they got a fresh layer of middlemen, higher fees, and an ad ecosystem that looks suspiciously like an arbitrage pyramid scheme.
🚨 Spoiler alert: Curation is not the golden ticket publishers were promised.
Because instead of empowering publishers, it’s just giving intermediaries yet another excuse to siphon ad dollars away from the people actually creating content.
1️⃣ The Great Curation Bait-and-Switch: Premium Rates, They Said. Ha!
Publishers were sold a dream: curated deals would elevate their inventory, attract premium buyers, and finally give them pricing power. Instead, here’s what actually happened:
🔻 The promised higher CPMs turned into higher fees—just not for publishers. Ad tech vendors simply found new ways to insert themselves into the deal flow and skim off the top.
🔻 Those “premium rates” publishers were expecting? Vanished faster than a crypto influencer after a rug pull. Because at the end of the day, advertisers aren’t necessarily paying more—they’re just paying differently. And somehow, that extra spend never seems to make its way back to the publishers.
🔻 Meanwhile, the so-called “premium inventory” is often the exact same programmatic supply that was available before—only now it comes with a fancy new label and a markup.
So instead of winning big with curation, publishers are just watching their ad dollars take a scenic detour through unnecessary intermediaries before eventually dribbling back to them in whatever’s left over.
2️⃣ Buying Back Their Own Audience (Because That Makes Total Sense, Right?)
One of the most absurd things about the current curation landscape? Publishers are being forced to buy back their own audiences.
Yes, you read that right.
Here’s how it works:
1️⃣ A publisher sells its inventory through a curation provider.
2️⃣ The curation provider “enhances” it with data (which often includes signals that publishers already had access to).
3️⃣ That same inventory is then sold back to the publisher’s own buyers—with a markup.
Which means publishers are paying extra for access to their own audience.
Imagine running a restaurant, only to find out that DoorDash is charging you extra to deliver food to customers already sitting inside your dining room.
That’s what’s happening here. Publishers already owned these audiences, but now they’re being forced to re-enter bidding wars just to reach them.
So, remind me again—how exactly was curation supposed to empower publishers?
3️⃣ Even the Big Guys Can’t Make It Work (So What Chance Do Smaller Publishers Have?)
If curation were truly the game-changer it claims to be, you’d expect major publishers—the ones with scale, first-party data, and direct advertiser relationships—to be cashing in.
🚨 That’s not happening.
Take Vox Media. They own:
✔️ An SSP.
✔️ A first-party data platform.
✔️ A powerhouse publishing brand with valuable inventory.
Yet, even they aren’t seeing significant revenue lifts from curation.
If a company with that level of control and infrastructure can’t squeeze meaningful value out of curated deals, what hope does a mid-sized or independent publisher have?
It’s like watching a billionaire try to flip houses in a collapsing market—if even they can’t make money, something is fundamentally broken.
4️⃣ So, Where Did All the Money Go? (Hint: Not to Publishers)
According to AdExchanger, publishers are still waiting for the revenue boost they were promised. The story feels eerily familiar:
🔻 Where did all the extra ad spend go?
🔻 Why aren’t publishers seeing real gains in CPMs?
🔻 Why does it feel like ad tech middlemen are benefitting more than anyone else?
Simple: because the real innovation in curation isn’t better ad buying—it’s better ad tech rent-seeking.
Curation was pitched as a way to create efficiency, transparency, and control. Instead, it’s just another pay-to-play system where dollars get rerouted through unnecessary intermediaries before eventually trickling back to the actual content creators.
So here we are again: publishers doing all the work, ad tech taking all the profit, and a programmatic ecosystem that just keeps inventing new ways to extract value without actually creating it.
At this point, publishers must be asking themselves: Are we selling ad inventory, or are we just selling ad tech a reason to exist?
The Great Curation Hustle: Selling Garbage at a Premium
The room is dark, low-lit, the kind of ambiance that suggests secrets traded in whispers and business done in handshakes that leave grease on the palm. The conference lanyards swing like dog tags, badges of honor in a war no one will admit is lost. The curation guys are here—slick, eager, always with the same pitch, delivered with the urgency of a man selling life insurance to a drowning victim.
"We take only the best inventory," they say, as if selecting fine cuts of steak rather than slicing mold off spoiled meat. "We apply data," they insist, as if a coat of fresh paint will hide the rot beneath.
Here’s the truth, the kind they won’t put in their pitch decks: Curation is the new laundering, the same old polluted stream, just passed through a few extra filters before it stains your brand.
The inventory is still junk. The placements are still bottom-barrel. The ads still run unseen, trapped in the dark corners of the internet, where human eyes rarely go but bots feast in numbers beyond comprehension. And the curation guys? They pocket their cut and walk away, leaving the advertisers to sift through reports, wondering why their performance looks like a crime scene.
The danger isn’t just the waste—the billions poured into black holes of fraud and irrelevance. It’s the illusion. The idea that programmatic, broken as it is, can be redeemed if only we trust the right middleman, pay a little more for the same mirage.
The brands don’t buy it. The agencies, at least the ones that still have reputations to lose, don’t either. But the small-time DSPs, the resellers, the ones who can’t sell on quality alone? They need the story. They need curation, because without it, all they have is what they really are: brokers of digital garbage, hustlers in a market that no longer pretends to care where the money goes.
Be scared. Not just of the fraud, not just of the wasted spend. Be scared of the lie that something can be polished when it was never anything more than dirt.
So, Where Does This Leave Us?
Curation can be the future of programmatic advertising—if, and only if, it’s done with actual intelligence rather than a glorified game of digital Three-card Monte.
Let’s be clear: there’s a huge difference between real curation and whatever nonsense is currently being peddled under that name.
✔️ Real curation brings actual value to the table—meaning real audience insights, efficiency, and an ability to improve campaign performance beyond just slapping a new label on the same tired inventory. The best in the game? Companies like Audigent and Multilocal, which are actually building something beyond smoke and mirrors.
❌ Fake curation, on the other hand, is just a more expensive middle layer—a repackaging of arbitrage that exists purely to extract fees rather than add value. These are the firms that introduce extra complexity, inflate costs, and make media buyers feel like they’re doing something innovative when, in reality, they’re just being taxed for the privilege of participating in the same old inefficient system.
And that’s the crux of it: curation could be the savior of programmatic, but not if it turns into yet another excuse for ad tech middlemen to bloat the supply chain while pretending to “fix” it.
The companies that win in this space will be the ones that offer true innovation—not just a new name for arbitrage with extra fees baked in. The rest? They need to either prove they’re doing something actually meaningful or get out of the way.
Because at the end of the day, if curation just becomes another rent-seeking toll booth in the programmatic highway, let’s call it what it really is: a dressed-up tax on efficiency, pretending to be a solution.
Subscribe to our premium content at ADOTAT+ to read the rest.
Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
Upgrade