In 2 years you will be working for AI

Or an AI will be working for you

Here's how you can future-proof yourself:

Join 1,000,000+ pros at companies like Google, Meta, and Amazon that are using AI to get ahead.

Sign up and start learning AI

The media buyers who swear their campaign is “optimized” but can’t explain the funnel. They’re quoting ADOTAT+ on calls like they thought of it themselves.

Because we don’t just break news—we expose it, dissect it, and serve it raw with receipts. Vendor drama? We’ve got the texts. Ad tech fraud? We name names. Holding company whispers? We’ve already heard them scream.

This isn’t a newsletter. It’s a crowbar for prying open the black box of this industry.

If you’d rather skip the recycled LinkedIn threads and get to the part where you actually know what you’re talking about, join ADOTAT+. Or don’t—and let your competitor use our reporting to crush your next pitch.

This is not a eulogy. Yet.

Let’s not kid ourselves.

For nearly a century, Nielsen didn’t just measure TV — they were TV. Their name was carved into the granite of the media temple. Nielsen ratings weren’t just data — they were gospel. They told you which shows lived, which execs got bonuses, and who got a one-way ticket to syndication heaven. If Nielsen said your audience was 4 million? Pop champagne. If it was 400,000? Hope you liked working in Canadian sci-fi.

And for decades, no one had the guts to challenge them.

Suggesting an “alternative currency” in 2012 was like walking into the Vatican with a stack of tarot cards. Say “multi-currency” in a room full of media planners and you’d get the same look you’d earn by asking if anyone still buys DVDs.

Nielsen was the sun. Everyone else was just orbiting.

But power built on consensus? It ages like dairy.

Let’s talk about the holy relics: C3 and C7 — the ratings that measured the average commercial minute over three and seven days. Yes, we really built a $70 billion advertising economy on averages of averages of maybe-someone-watched-that.

But hey, it worked.
Because we all agreed it did.

Advertisers transacted. Networks pitched. Agencies baked it into spreadsheets and dared not ask too many questions. It was the lingua franca of media, even if nobody liked how it sounded.

Then the world changed.

Streaming. Mobile. TikTok. Cord-cutting. Viewer behavior didn’t just shift — it fractured. And C3? It started to feel like trying to measure a thunderstorm with a rain gauge taped to your window.

But the industry didn’t bolt — not yet. Because flawed and consistent still felt better than chaotic and unknown.

In 2020, Nielsen’s panel operations hit a wall. Field teams couldn’t enter homes. Panels aged, attrited, and rotted. Devices went uncalibrated. And the numbers? They slipped—hard.

The Media Rating Council finally did the unthinkable: they yanked Nielsen’s national accreditation. That wasn’t a wrist slap. That was the measurement equivalent of pulling a Michelin star while dinner’s being served.

Suddenly, that unshakable faith in Nielsen? Shaken.

Agencies started looking sideways.
Networks whispered about iSpot and VideoAmp.
Tech vendors, once dismissed as dashboard hobbyists, got invited to pitch rooms they’d never have sniffed in 2019.

And for the first time in decades, the industry dared to ask:
“If Nielsen was wrong… then who else might be right?”

To their credit, Nielsen didn’t fold. They rebooted.

They launched Panel + Big Data — a hybrid cocktail of their traditional panel and massive data from set-top boxes and smart TVs. Visibility into 75 million devices across 45 million households. They cleaned up the panel. Hired new comms. Showed up at conferences like it was 2007 all over again.

By 2023? MRC accreditation was back. Crisis contained… for now.

But while the front door was being polished, the side door had a security camera pointed at the competition. Nielsen started filing lawsuits like it was a sport. VideoAmp, HyphaMetrics, ACRCloud — anyone with a measuring stick and a website got served.

Was it about protecting IP? Or was it classic corporate territory defense?
Depends on who you ask. But either way, the message was loud and clear:
“You can challenge us — but you’re going to bleed legal fees.”

And then comes the real buzzkill: John F. Collins, Strategic Advisor and industry vet who’s seen this rodeo before — and he’s not buying the hype.

“Nielsen is the currency — and it will remain the currency,” Collins says, blunt as a sledgehammer. “The economics of advertising don’t support the fantasy of a truly multi-currency ecosystem.”

Two decades ago, at Time Warner Cable, Collins had access to everything — full set-top box data, a serious cross-MVPD initiative, the works. “After months of deep analysis,” he explains, “we concluded it simply wasn’t worth the effort. The juice wasn’t worth the squeeze — even with superior data access.”

And as for all the OEMs waving their ACR data around like it’s Excalibur?
He’s not impressed.

“The TV OEM crowd have to stop smoking their own stash,” he says, deadpan. “ACR data is great if you want to know what people with brand X TVs are watching — but in no way does that constitute a Nielsen-quality data set. It just doesn’t. And keep saying it won’t make it better.”

He’s throwing shade at Samba TV.

Let that sink in: millions of TVs, rivers of data, and still not enough to dethrone a 40,000-household panel.

And the classic rebuttal? Collins has heard it. Many times.
“But we have millions of TVs with our ACR data,” they say.
“That has to be better than a Nielsen panel!”

His response? “It’s NOT. And anyone who is paying attention knows that.”

Yes, Nielsen still holds the keys to most of the money. The Upfronts, the scatter, the IOs — most of it still runs through Nielsen numbers. They are the default. The habit.

But here’s the kicker: the fastest-growing ad dollars aren’t in their stronghold anymore.
CTV is on track to hit $20.5 billion this year, and $30 billion by 2029. It’s not just reach anymore — it’s full-funnel, shoppable, and retail media-fueled campaigns that Amazon, Walmart, and Samsung can tie directly to purchases.

When you can measure conversions, engagement time, and direct action down to the SKU, the idea of a static panel currency starts to look… quaint.

Confidence is thinning.
Buyers are hedging.
Publishers are experimenting.
Agencies are building escape hatches just in case.

What Nielsen has now isn’t dominance — it’s entrenchment. And entrenchment is just a slow erosion away from irrelevance.

Nielsen’s not dead.
They’re not even on life support.
But for the first time in a long, long time — they’re not in control.

They’re reacting. They’re defending. They’re explaining — when for decades, they just declared. The illusion of neutrality? Gone. The idea of measurement as truth? Fractured.

They’re still king.
But the court is restless.

And the challengers? They’re not waiting for a coronation.

Welcome to the Measurement Wars.
This was just the opening volley.

Next up: the companies with the ambition, audacity, and maybe — just maybe — the scale to make a real run at the throne.

Stay bold. Stay curious. Know more than you did yesterday.
And maybe… make friends with someone in legal. You’re going to need them.

Let’s break this down in plain English — and a few sharp elbows.

This is the raw (or cooked) data about who saw what, when, and how.

Think:

🧠 Measurement is the methodology. It’s how you gather data and interpret it.

This is the agreed-upon source of truth for paying for advertising.

You can measure all you want, but only currency providers get to settle the bill.

Everyone wants to be the "currency" because that’s where the money and power live. Measurement vendors want to be seen as "truth-tellers," but the ones who get used in upfronts and ad deals get to control the market.

Here's what's really going on:

Measurement is science.
Currency is politics.

And in this industry, the politics always win—until someone asks to see the receipts.

While some may still associate Nielsen with little black boxes and legacy panels, the company has been quietly reengineering its DNA.

Over the past few years, it has leaned heavily into first-party data—and the result is a very different Nielsen than the one most critics like to caricature.

At the heart of that evolution is Nielsen ONE: a cross-media measurement platform built to solve the most stubborn pain points of modern marketing—fragmentation, deduplication, and audience planning across screens. It combines the trust of panel data with the precision of big data from 45 million U.S. households and over 75 million devices. That includes smart TVs, set-top boxes, CTV partners, and an ever-growing stack of first-party data relationships.

This isn’t just a product upgrade—it’s a strategic pivot. Nielsen is betting that trust and infrastructure still matter, especially when CMOs have to justify spend to their CFOs. The inclusion of real outcomes data, advanced audience insights, and planning tools shows a serious attempt to bridge measurement and media activation—not just track eyeballs, but connect them to business impact.

And to their credit, Nielsen has been open about the process. Over the course of several weeks, their team sat down with us—on and off the record—to walk through how the system works, where it’s headed, and what questions we should be asking competitors. They didn’t just tolerate scrutiny. They invited it. And, frankly, offered us more pointed questions than some of the challengers were willing to answer themselves.

In a chaotic measurement landscape filled with buzzwords, patents, and lawsuits, that kind of transparency—and infrastructure—might still be Nielsen’s most underrated asset.

The TV measurement world has no shortage of swagger right now. If you believe the trade headlines and LinkedIn peacocking, Nielsen is a relic—sputtering toward obsolescence while its younger, faster, AI-optimized rivals sharpen their knives.

VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, and HyphaMetrics have emerged as the self-declared resistance—armed with glossy dashboards, fresh funding rounds, and the full blessing of the Joint Industry Committee (JIC).

That JIC stamp, a shiny “transaction ready” badge, has been dangled like a golden ticket to the post-Nielsen economy.

But here’s the quiet part no one likes to say out loud: certification isn’t currency. And the revolution? It isn’t happening.

Let’s start with the cold, economic truth: Nielsen is still the currency, because the system—every line of code, every rate card, every reconciliation model—is built around it. Changing that isn’t a quick swap; it’s open-heart surgery on a billion-dollar transaction system.

And no, it’s not just inertia. It’s history. It’s scale. It’s what happens when a company’s data is hardwired into the media bloodstream for decades.

John F. Collins, Strategic Advisor at Tiger Strategy Advisors and former executive at Time Warner Cable, knows exactly how difficult it is to replace Nielsen—because he tried.

Twenty-five years ago, he had full access to set-top box data across Time Warner Cable, brought together business, tech, programming, and ad sales, and spent months analyzing the possibility of building a true Nielsen alternative. The conclusion was crystal clear: the juice wasn’t worth the squeeze. Even with superior data access, building something even half as credible as Nielsen is prohibitively hard and expensive.

The dream of a seamless swap? A fantasy. Not because these other companies aren’t smart—but because they’re trying to rebuild an ecosystem from scratch. And that ecosystem isn’t just made of clean datasets and a clever UI. It’s layers of trust, scrutiny, and economic reality.

Yes, VideoAmp, iSpot, and Comscore all passed the JIC’s 699-point checklist. And yes, HyphaMetrics, the boutique measurement firm with a PhD-level methodology and a federal courtroom win against Nielsen, has earned some well-deserved respect. But here’s the catch: JIC certification is not the same thing as adoption.

It’s not MRC accreditation, which audits methodology for accuracy. It’s an operational stress test. Can you ingest data fast enough? Do your pipes hold up during live sports? Can your dashboard run without crashing Chrome?

Great—but none of that gets you into the actual transaction layer.

As Collins puts it, if the industry would just acknowledge that Nielsen is the actual trading currency, it would eliminate 80% of the current chaos. Everyone else—from iSpot to VideoAmp to the OEM crowd—should focus on how to contribute to a smarter, more complete view of media consumption, not pretend they’ve created a better mousetrap with some magical “census” dataset.

Because that “census” dataset? Not what you think.

They say they have millions of TVs with ACR data—that has to be better than Nielsen’s panel. It’s not. And anyone paying attention knows that.

Collins isn’t anti-innovation. He’s pro-reality. ACR data is great if you want to know what people with brand X TV are watching. But that doesn’t make it a Nielsen-quality dataset. And repeating the claim doesn’t make it true.

Corinne Casagrande, SVP of Strategy at AMS, spends $4 million a year on measurement data across CTV and streaming. Her conclusion is brutally honest: if you are buying on basic demos, you will use Nielsen until you no longer buy ads that show up on a TV screen.

She’s tested VideoAmp. She’s explored the alternatives. But they’re not interchangeable. Nielsen vs. VideoAmp? They’re all different football games.

So why pay for VideoAmp too? Because they’re flexible. They help with tool builds and innovation. There is no such thing as custom anything or a negotiation with Nielsen.

Nielsen is a monopoly—but it’s a functioning one. And it works because it’s survived more scrutiny than any other data set in advertising. At any Nielsen client event, they stand up and take fire from clients. It’s part of the culture.

And here’s the kicker — the fastest-growing ad spend isn’t even in the market Nielsen built its empire on. CTV is a $20.5 billion market this year, on its way to $30 billion by 2029, driven by shoppable ads, retail media tie-ins, and interactive formats. That’s where Amazon, Walmart, and Samsung are training their sights — and it’s also where Nielsen’s panel DNA feels more analog than digital.

If you’re hoping that some measurement startup is going to “fix” CTV attribution for you—good luck. Casagrande is crystal clear: whether this works or not isn’t up to a vendor. Performance TV doesn’t work unless you design it right.

That setup problem is why 58% of marketers are still throwing more money at CTV in the back half of 2025 — more than any other channel. But more than half also admit they can’t get clean cross-channel visibility. So the vendor pitch of “We’ll fix your CTV measurement”? Great in a deck. Less great when your data’s living in five silos and your attribution window closes before the product ships.

She’s seen real results, but never from spray-and-pray programmatic buys. She’s never seen a performance advertiser use programmatic outside of Amazon for CTV successfully. Just direct publisher—so there are actually ads running at a decent CPM—with tags to tie airings to an ID.

And even those tags are legacy solutions: the cheapest and most effective tagging option performance CTV advertisers like is Extreme Reach. Again, rooted in legacy TV.

Casagrande doesn’t fantasize about perfect attribution—she optimizes the denominator. She finds the pod before Showcase Showdown on The Price Is Right because that’s when seniors call Medicare hotlines in droves. She knows the rhythms of the screen—and no AI panel can teach that.

HyphaMetrics has won in court, sure. Their methodology—focused on person-level insights, deduplicated across devices—is as clean as it gets. But they’re not pretending to be the new central bank. They’re positioning themselves as the boutique analyst—not the vault.

They know they don’t have the scale. But they also know scale without accuracy is noise. And while everyone else is chasing GRPs in the metaverse, Hypha is methodically building a panel that might someday offer actual cross-platform truth.

They’re not screaming for attention—they’re building for longevity.

VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, and HyphaMetrics have earned their right to exist. They’re injecting the market with competition, ideas, and much-needed tension. But Nielsen still owns the transaction. And until someone else can deliver that level of trust, scale, and integration, the crown stays put.

This isn’t a story about disruption. It’s a story about infrastructure. You don’t replace the central bank because it’s old. You replace it when the new one can issue bonds, stabilize markets, and get CFOs to sign deals.

Right now, Nielsen still prints the money. The rest? They’re making noise.

Stay bold. Stay curious. Know more than you did yesterday.

You’ve read about HyphaMetrics dodging Nielsen’s legal hammer and TVScientific swinging for Google-sized outcomes. But that’s just the free sample.

Here’s what we unpack behind the paywall in ADOTAT+:

💡 Everyone says they want performance. Everyone says they want proof. Few are ready for the accountability that comes with both.

👉 Upgrade to ADOTAT+ and see the full playbook.