Welcome to Unmeasured.
Every week, one story about what TV measurement actually claims to know, and how much of that claim survives contact with the math.
You'll also meet Frank Kowalczyk. Forty years in this business, starting on the retail scanner-data side at A.C. Nielsen in the 1980s, through the merger into Nielsen's TV ratings division, and from there through comScore, Arbitron, Rentrak, a return to Nielsen on the digital side, a stint on the verification side at DoubleVerify, back to comScore once more after its merger with Rentrak, a run at iSpot, and a period at VideoAmp early enough to have watched the language in this week's story get written for the first time.

These days he does contract methodology audits for companies that don't put his name in the press release. He still lives outside Chicago.
He is, by his own account, building a boat in his garage, and has been for six years.
He shows up in the margins here, set apart from the reporting, saying what he actually thinks. Every line is marked so you always know whose voice you're in.
Straight reporting, one number at a time. And Frank, who's seen the number get made before.
Comscore's August 11 restructuring announcement, branded internally as "ROI Strategy," disclosed $20 to 25 million in annualized cost cuts and a headcount reduction the company has not put a specific number on, though sources describe it as over 100 positions. The announcement did not use the word "layoffs." Notably, the executive pay concessions tied to the same restructuring carry a stated end date: CEO compensation reverts to no less than $663,063 and the CFO's to $400,000 on January 1, 2028. No comparable reversion date has been disclosed for the eliminated positions.
Separately, the Media Rating Council told ADOTAT in a written statement that offshoring processing work or removing certain data inputs, specifically an MVPD set-top-box dataset central to Comscore's accredited local and national TV measurement, could constitute a material change requiring immediate re-audit rather than waiting for the next scheduled review. Comscore was asked for comment before publication and did not respond.
FRANK: "ROI Strategy" is what you call layoffs when the lawyers are in the room. I've sat through the meeting where someone workshops that phrase. It takes longer than the layoffs do.
ADOTAT's ongoing series on MRC accreditation has drawn a new response worth flagging: a spokesperson confirmed in writing that the MRC does not accredit companies, services as a whole, or general methods, only specific reported metrics within specific environments, devices, and geographies, and that even a syndicated measurement giant like Nielsen's national TV service is limited to a defined set of metrics under that accreditation. The MRC also confirmed that VideoAmp's withdrawal from its audit process occurred in June 2026, not July as earlier reported elsewhere, a correction now on the public record. Separately, the MRC acknowledged that its own published lists of accredited services are not currently granular enough to show which specific metrics are covered, and said it is working to add that detail.
FRANK: "We're MRC accredited" doing the work it's doing in every sales deck in this industry is the same move as a restaurant hanging a health department grade for the bathroom and letting you assume it covers the kitchen too.
A third thread, still developing: ADOTAT has been examining whether a local television advertiser can independently verify that a CTV or streaming ad campaign delivered anything beyond mere ad delivery. Sources with direct experience in measurement methodology describe device-to-location matching used in these campaigns as inherently probabilistic, a sample drawn from a sample, and say that genuinely independent verification at the local level would require controlled experiments or marketing mix modeling, tools generally unavailable to a small, local advertiser's budget. No source contacted for this story has identified an existing local CTV attribution report that would meet that bar.
FRANK: Ask your butcher how old the fish is. If he changes the subject, that's your answer, even before he gives you one.
This week's deep dive: VideoAmp says its platform processed $6 billion in "currency and measurement" deals last year. That figure has circulated in investor materials, trade press, and public statements from company leadership for several months. Over two weeks of reporting, including outreach to VideoAmp and to the buy-side and sell-side companies it names as active users of its platform, ADOTAT was unable to find anyone who could explain, in specific terms, how that number was calculated or what portion of it reflects money actually spent. VideoAmp did not answer any of the thirteen questions this publication sent about it.
Why join ADOTAT+
Because the free version tells you what's happening. The paid version tells you what actually happened, which is a different story most weeks.
You get the sourcing, not just the headline. Every investigation runs its full reporting behind the wall, the documents, the on-record quotes, the math that made a company stop answering emails.
You get Frank uncut. Free readers get the short version. Paid readers get the version where he actually finishes the thought.
You get to read things companies asked us not to publish. We published them anyway. That's most of the point.
Ads don't buy coverage here. We run them. They don't get a vote. Your subscription is what keeps that arrangement possible.
You're not funding a hobby. You're funding the two people who chase down thirteen unanswered questions until somebody finally answers eleven of them.
$99/month, or $600/year if you'd rather stop thinking about it. Cancel whenever. We won't be offended. We'll just assume you already knew the ending.
You've read this far. Read the rest with us.
Members fund the reporting and read it first. No advertisers, no sponsored anything, just the people who want this work to exist.
Join ADOTAT+What members get:
- Every investigation, including the ones with a lawyer's fingerprints on them. Those are the good ones.
- The Field Kit. Because "do your own diligence" is useless advice without the actual checklist.
- Their side, unedited. You get the full statement before I take it apart. Judge for yourself which of us is being unfair.
- No paid editorial. Not one word, not ever. If it's in the copy, nobody paid to put it there.

