“This Is Fine,” Said Everyone, as the Cookie Burned, Elon Flag-Wrapped His Supply Chain, and Roblox Forgot What It Was Selling

Ok folks, I missed last week. Sue me. I was on “vacation” — which in media means answering Slack messages from a different timezone while pretending Aperol Spritzes are self-care. But this week? Oh, this week… It’s like Google, Tesla, and Roblox all looked at their 2025 goals and said, “What if we didn’t?”

We’re talking Google pulling a Houdini on cookies (again), Tesla rebranding “Made in USA” to mean “assembled nearby-ish,” and Roblox turning brand partnerships into a Choose-Your-Own-Confusion experience. That’s just the appetizer.

From Criteo cosplaying QVC to Omnicom’s influencer duct tape solution and Meta somehow winning awards for not sucking — this week’s adtech headlines were a kaleidoscope of chaos, comedy, and corporate branding gone feral.

And just when you thought it couldn’t get spicier? The DOJ decided to finally RSVP to Google’s ad stack monopoly party. Bring snacks. It’s gonna be a long deposition.

Stay bold. Stay curious. And for the love of CPMs, know more than you did yesterday.

🚨 1. Google Ghosts the Cookiepocalypse — And Yes, We’re Screaming Into the Void

👀 What Just Happened:
After five years of breathless presentations, half-baked APIs, and sandbox metaphors that went nowhere, Google has officially noped out of its promised third-party cookie “choice” prompt. Chrome will not give users a standalone option. Because why empower users when you can just gesture vaguely at a settings menu?

📎 The Evidence Wall:
Anthony Chavez, Google’s Privacy Sandbox czar, announced the pullback in a blog post that somehow made dodging accountability sound like a UX enhancement. The reason? “Divergent feedback.” Translation: the entire adtech ecosystem said “meh” and regulators started sharpening their knives post-Apple’s ATT fine.

🎯 The Flip-Flop:
Google swore it would lead the charge into a privacy-first future. Now it’s moonwalking backwards like it's 1985 and Thriller just dropped. And conveniently, just as Europe’s antitrust watchdogs start frothing over cookie replacements, Google throws the towel in and says, “We’re good.”

🤨 Just Asking Here:
So after all the FLoCs, Topics, and thousands of industry man-hours, Chrome is… still using cookies? The most powerful company in advertising spent half a decade staging a revolution, and we’re back to square one with a slightly redesigned cookie banner. Thanks for the trauma.

🔥 TL;DR:
Privacy Sandbox wasn’t a bridge to the future—it was a cul-de-sac with a Google signpost. Cookies are staying. Deal with it.

🗣️ Street Wisdom:
Buyers are relieved. Publishers are bitter. Privacy advocates are livid. And everyone’s pretending this isn’t the biggest “just kidding” since New Coke.

🚨 2. Tesla’s ‘Made in USA’ Myth Busted — Spoiler: It’s 25% Mexico

🔧 The Setup (Now With Patriotic Soundtrack):
Tesla has been basking in red, white, and blue glow, proudly claiming its cars are Made in America. Problem is, the Federal Trade Commission’s definition doesn’t include “kinda, mostly, except for that 25%.”

📜 Your Honor, The Receipts:
Truth In Advertising (TINA) dropped a not-so-little love note to Tesla’s legal team, pointing out that up to a quarter of its vehicle components come from outside the U.S., including Mexico. That’s kind of a dealbreaker when you’re slapping on stars and stripes like it’s a campaign ad.

🌀 The Redirection:
Sure, Tesla builds cars in the U.S. But that doesn’t mean it’s playing by the FTC’s “virtually all domestic” rules. Even Elon—yes, the guy with rocket ships and memes—admitted in a March letter that some parts are impossible to source here. So… what’s the point of the branding again?

🧠 Let’s Walk This Through:
You can’t market a product as “Made in the USA” just because it’s assembled in California and Musk tweets it. The FTC doesn’t care how cool your dashboard looks if 25% of it was built somewhere else. And consumers are finally calling that bluff.

🔥 TL;DR:
Tesla’s nationalism is mostly marketing. Like claiming your iPhone is made in the USA because you assembled it on your desk.

🗣️ Industry Tea:
Ford’s keeping it humble. Stellantis backed off fast. Tesla? Still riding the stars and stripes like it’s a Tesla Cyber Rodeo.

🚨 3. Roblox Is a Marketing Maze — And Brands Are Tapping Out

🎮 Insert Coin to Be Confused:
Roblox is supposed to be Gen Z heaven for brands. But right now? It’s more like a confusing multiplayer campaign with no tutorial and too many team captains yelling over each other.

📌 Who’s Pitching What?
Developers, creators, and Roblox's own sales team are pitching totally different ad strategies. Want a branded world? One team. Want pre-roll ads? Another. Want to just give up and run something on Twitch instead? You wouldn’t be alone.

🎳 The Brand Carnage:
Multiple brands in active negotiations bailed after Roblox’s own team undercut studios mid-deal. Marketers had a million-dollar budget and ended up in a half-baked minigame built by a teenager with a Lua script and a dream.

🤯 Let Me Get This Straight:
Roblox wants to be the YouTube of immersive ads. But right now it’s the MySpace of branded chaos—everyone’s customizing their pitch, but no one knows which music auto-plays.

🔥 TL;DR:
Roblox needs an ad product manager, a brand playbook, and maybe a cold shower. Right now, it’s a mess with good intentions and bad follow-through.

🗣️ Street Noise:
Studios are pissed. Brands are confused. Roblox says “growth is strong,” which is like saying the Titanic had great departure numbers.

🚨 4. Omnicom Declares “Creo” the Cure for Influencer Chaos — Good Luck with That

👀 Scene One: Corporate Branding in the Wild
Omnicom Media Group just slapped a new name on its global influencer marketing ops: Creo. Latin for “I create,” but also corporate for “please don’t notice this is duct tape and hope.”

📜 Cue the Briefing Slide:
Launched in 2022, now consolidated globally in 2025, Creo claims “first-mover” data access and will tap into Omni, Omnicom’s ad OS. They’ve got Snap deals, TikTok collabs, Amazon integrations — and not a single global CEO named yet. It’s like building a spaceship with no pilot, but really good targeting.

🎭 Behind the Curtain:
This is less about creators and more about scale. Influencer marketing is now a $33B monster. Creo isn’t selling authenticity. It’s selling efficiency with vibes. Less fashion week, more programmatic.

🧠 Let Me Guess:
The pitch? “We’ve solved influencer marketing.” The reality? It’s still messy AF. Talent is flaky, ROI is murky, and no amount of Omni dashboards will make your mid-tier Instagram momfluencer look natural holding a Mountain Dew bottle.

🔥 TL;DR:
Omnicom just centralized the chaos under a slick new brand. It might work. It might not. But hey — it’ll look great in the next earnings call.

🗣️ Agency Groupchat Energy:
“Anyone know what Creo actually does?”
“No, but they have a case study with Snap so we’re gonna pitch it.”

🚨 5. Criteo's Shoppable Video Ads Want You to Click While You Stream — Because Why Not?

📺 Welcome to the Commerce Content Multiverse:
Criteo just dropped shoppable video ads across hundreds of retail media networks. So now, your casual scroll on a store site can become a full-blown QVC episode. No host, just algorithms.

📜 The Big Reveal:
These aren’t pre-rolls or banner pop-ups. These are full-blown product showcases embedded inside digital retail environments. Buy while you watch. Because passive consumption is so 2023.

🎢 The Pitch:
Advertisers are being told this is the new frontier of conversion. No more guessing if a shopper is interested. Just show the video, flash the “add to cart” button, and pray they’re bored at work.

🧠 Just Asking Questions:
Is this the future of ecomm or just a clever way to sell video inventory that didn’t work on YouTube? Either way, your yoga mat is now starring in its own cinematic trailer.

🔥 TL;DR:
Criteo wants to be the streaming-era infomercial engine. And it might actually work — especially for people who shop like they binge: distracted and reckless.

🗣️ Whisper in the Retail Halls:
“It’s content!”
“It’s commerce!”
“It’s… just a video ad with better lighting.”

🚨 6. Meta Wins “Best Tools” Like It’s a Participation Trophy — Except They Kinda Deserve It?

🏆 The Setup (We Swear This Isn’t a Joke):
Meta’s Business Suite and Ads Manager just won awards for best social media marketing tools of 2025. For once, they didn’t just show up — they cleaned up.

📜 Where’s the Proof?
They streamlined cross-platform content, simplified ad buying, and even improved real-time performance tracking. This isn’t Meta from 2020. This is the version that might actually be… functional?

🎮 Meta’s Glow-Up:
After years of being the clunky, privacy-be-damned villain of ad tech, Meta finally built something useful. And people noticed. Agencies aren’t rolling their eyes anymore — they’re actually logging in.

🧠 OK But Let’s Not Forget:
Meta is still Meta. But when the bar is as low as “not crashing,” even a halfway decent UI starts to feel revolutionary.

🔥 TL;DR:
Marketers are finally admitting it: Meta's tools don’t suck anymore. Congrats?

🗣️ From the Media Buying Trenches:
“Don’t tell anyone… but I actually prefer Ads Manager now.”
“Same. Also, it doesn’t glitch when I export reports anymore. Is this growth?”

🚨 7. Antitrust Heat Hits Google — and This Time It’s Real

⚖️ The Opening Statement:
A U.S. judge ruled that Google’s ad stack strategy — controlling the buy side and sell side — violates antitrust laws. Across the pond, the EU is prepping their own takedown under the Digital Markets Act.

📜 Courtroom Drama:
The ruling targets Google’s publisher ad server and ad exchange dominance, which effectively let it bid against itself, set prices, and still win. Structural remedies are on the table. Yes, that means a potential breakup.

💥 Fallout Forecast:
Ad Manager without the exchange? DV360 without the preferential treatment? Google’s dominance isn’t over — but it’s being cracked open like a piñata at a regulatory birthday party.

🧠 Let’s Be Honest:
Everyone in ad tech knew this day would come. The only surprise is that it took this long to say, “Hey, maybe the house shouldn’t also be the dealer, banker, and landlord.”

🔥 TL;DR:
Google’s ad stack empire is officially under siege. Breakup isn’t just a buzzword — it’s a possibility.

🗣️ Industry Slack Thread:
“If they split off AdX, I want first dibs on the exit interview transcript.”

WTF, Google? 🤯 The Cookie Crumbles… Then Gets Duct-Taped Back Together

Let’s call this what it is: a spectacular act of corporate cowardice wrapped in a beige blanket of PR doublespeak.

After five years of posturing, pivoting, and promising a future without third-party cookies—five years of forcing the entire ad tech industry into a collective existential panic attack—Google just mumbled, “Eh, nevermind.”

In a blog post so dry it could be used to dehydrate fruit, Anthony Chavez, Google’s VP of Privacy Sandbox, announced that Chrome will not be rolling out a new prompt for users to manage third-party cookies.

That big shiny mechanism that was supposed to lead us into a privacy-first utopia?
🚫 Scrapped. Ghosted. Abandoned like an orphaned DTC brand after Black Friday.

Instead, users can continue “choosing” their cookie settings… deep in the bowels of Chrome’s settings menu, somewhere between "clear cache" and "sell your soul to the algorithm." 🛠️

So What Happened? 🕵️‍♂️

The official line? Google got “divergent perspectives” from the industry.

Which is Big Tech lingo for:
"Everyone hated this, and we didn’t want to deal with the blowback."

• Publishers said it would mess with revenue

• Ad tech firms were baffled by implementation

• Regulators raised one eyebrow too many

• CMOs quietly Googled “WTF is Topics API”

Meanwhile, France slapped Apple with a €150M fine for using its own privacy tools to choke out competition—and you can bet Google saw that and muttered, “Ain’t nobody got time for that.” 😬

So, rather than push forward, Google reached for its favorite tool: strategic inertia.

💸 Billions Spent. For What?

Let’s take a moment to honor the fallen:

• DSPs and SSPs who rebuilt pipes for FLEDGE and Topics 🙃

• Publishers who paused header bidding for “privacy-first experiments” 🙃

• Startups that raised millions selling “post-cookie identity” 🙃

• Marketers who built QBR decks around a timeline that just got nuked 🙃

This isn’t just a pivot. It’s a rug pull. A carefully choreographed stall-out dressed up as “responsiveness to feedback.”

It’s the Theranos of browser privacy promises—except instead of fake blood tests, we got fake timelines.

Welcome to Schrödinger’s Privacy Sandbox 🧪

Technically, the Privacy Sandbox still exists. But it’s now Schrödinger’s API Suite—neither alive nor dead, just awkwardly twitching in a GitHub repo while engineers wait for a directive that’ll never come.

Google says IP Protection is still coming (in Incognito mode, no less), and that they’ll “engage with the industry” to “reassess future investments.”

Translation?
“We’re going to see who screams loudest and wing it from there.”

🚨 The Real Takeaway

Let’s be blunt: Google played the whole industry.

They bought themselves time with empty promises and forced everyone else to move.
Now that the legal pressure’s heating up, they’re pulling the brakes—and pretending it’s just good product management.

This wasn’t about protecting users. It was about protecting revenue.
The only user Google ever really listens to? The one with a billion-dollar ad budget.

Final Thought from the AdTech Barstool 🥃

If you’re still planning your roadmap around anything Chrome says will happen “in the future,” I’ve got a bridge in FLoC City to sell you.

The cookieless world may still come—but not because Google led us there.
It’ll come because publishers, platforms, and buyers finally realize they can’t build a business on a browser controlled by a company that changes course like a drunken Segway.

So go ahead, update your decks. Just remember to use pencil this time.
And maybe—just maybe—next time Google says “this time it’s real,” we’ll all keep one eye on the “undo” button.

💥 Fool us once, shame on Google. Fool us for five years straight? That’s on us.

#StayBold #StayCurious #KnowMoreThanYouDidYesterday
#adtech #cookies #Google #PrivacySandbox #programmatic #ADOTATplus

🏰 Stay Bold. Stay Curious. And Know More Than You Did Yesterday.

💥 Why You Should Subscribe to ADOTAT+ (Before Your Boss Does)

Because it costs less than your Uber Eats delivery fee, and let's be honest—your last media plan cost way more and delivered way less.

🕵️‍♂️ Inside ADOTAT+ you’ll find what no spreadsheet will tell you:

• Who’s really circling Yahoo’s DSP—and who’s pretending they’re not

• Why reward ads are just Pavlovian games with prettier UX

• Which DSPs are quietly falling apart behind the NDA curtain

• And which “AI-powered” ad products are mostly duct tape and hope

💡 If you’ve ever read a headline and thought, “That’s not the whole story”—you’re our kind of reader.

This isn’t fluff. This is the good stuff: leaked decks, quiet acquisitions, real analysis, no PR gloss.

Because if you’re still relying on Twitter threads and corporate blogs to stay ahead?

You’re not ahead.
You’re lunch.

ADOTAT+. Subscribe. Because you deserve the truth—and a receipt.

Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.