Where Clean Rooms Are Hot and Trust is Optional: Because you didn’t spend $1.2 million on a DMP to be told it’s “all about clean rooms now.

If the phrase “first-party data strategy” gives you war flashbacks to 2022 and your inbox is just one long thread of AI vendors trying to "co-create your future," congrats—you’re exactly where we are.

This week in we swear we’re not making this up:

💍 WPP is courting InfoSum like it’s trying to win prom king of the privacy ball. The vibe? Data intimacy without actual contact. Swipe right for clean rooms, ghost later for budget cuts.

🧃 Google and Roblox have decided that what your 10-year-old really needs isn’t screen time limits—it’s pre-roll toothpaste ads for glitter hats. Incentivized capitalism for kids? Love that journey for us.

🧻 Post-election brand planners are crawling back to conservative media like an ex texting “U up?” at 2AM. The strategy? Try not to pick a side… while sponsoring every side.

🔍 Consumers hate personalized ads now, which shocks exactly zero people except for the folks who built the surveillance machine and are now crying into their device graphs.

🤖 AI is either adtech’s messiah or its next SEC investigation, depending on which conference keynote you accidentally walked into. Everyone’s “AI-led.” No one knows what that means.

🚰 And the stack? Oh, the stack. It's more bloated than a Thanksgiving dinner at a SaaS startup. We’ve added so many layers we’re now basically performance marketing lasagna—confusing, messy, and somehow still undercooked.

But hey, the good news? The industry’s still standing. Just a little tipsy, overly complicated, and clutching its CDP like a security blanket.

So grab your marshmallows. The fire’s still hot.

🚨 Tailored Ads Are Creeping People Out — And the Industry’s Still Acting Surprised

🕹️ The Strategy Shift:
Remember when everyone told you personalized ads were the future? Turns out, the future feels like surveillance. North American consumers are increasingly not into it. Apparently, getting a diaper ad just because you looked at a baby shower invite once is a bit much.

🧾 The Receipts:
New surveys show that more folks are uncomfortable with identity-based targeting than ever. It’s not just the tin foil hat crowd either—this is your mom, your boss, and probably you, side-eyeing that oddly specific Instagram ad.

🤹‍♀️ Didn’t See That Coming:
Actually… we did. Adtech’s been pushing cookies, device IDs, and fingerprinting like it’s a Tupperware party. Now, the same people who built the tracking matrix are shocked the villagers are grabbing torches.

🔮 Crystal Ball Moment:
If brands don’t start prioritizing transparency and control, consumers will keep running toward ad blockers, VPNs, and whatever “Do Not Track” button gives them the illusion of privacy.

🔥 The Big Question:
Is identity-based targeting the new pop-up ad—something we’ll all soon pretend we never thought was a good idea?

🎤 Industry Vibe Check:
Privacy advocates are smug. Platforms are frantically relabeling trackers as “engagement enhancers.” And CMOs? They’re quietly asking if “contextual” is cool again.

🚨 Ad Tech's Existential Crisis: Is AI the Savior or Just Another Buzzword with a Slide Deck?

🎯 The Playbook:
AI is the new glitter—sprinkled on everything from targeting to reporting dashboards. Some call it “the great equalizer,” others quietly wonder if it’s just automated gaslighting. Either way, ad tech is eating itself trying to decide if it's the hero or the villain of its own story.

📜 The Receipts:
Half the industry is writing love letters to AI-powered personalization, while the other half is warning it’s one server crash away from Orwell. In one corner: predictive performance boosts. In the other: "why did that CPG brand serve a diaper ad to my cat’s Instagram?"

👀 Didn’t See That Coming:
The loudest arguments are coming from inside the house. Vendors can’t agree if personalization is creepy or clever. Platforms are bragging about AI guardrails while also promising “hyper-relevance.” Someone’s definitely fibbing.

💭 What We’re Thinking:
Maybe the problem isn’t AI—it’s the people using it to sell more diet pills to people who Googled “kale once.” We keep saying "responsible use" but chasing CTRs like it’s 2013.

🚪 The Door Ajar:
Can adtech strike a balance between efficiency and ethics—or will AI just become the next scapegoat when targeting goes wrong?

📣 What They're Saying:
Engineers are coding like it’s a moon mission. CMOs are nodding in meetings while Googling “GPT vs LLM.” And agencies? Already pitching “AI-safe” media plans to brands that still think cookies are tasty.

🚨 The Adtech Paradox: Why "More" Is Just Another Word for "Broken"

🕹️ The Strategy Shift:
In adtech, the answer to every problem has historically been... stack more tech on it. More platforms, more IDs, more “solutions” that fix what the last ten broke. But surprise: more pipes don’t mean better plumbing. Just a noisier leak.

🧾 The Receipts:
Too many SSPs? Check—leading to bid duplication, logjammed auctions, and a delightful side of hidden fees. Too many identity “solutions”? Also check. Half the industry’s now chasing the same user across a dozen graphs while pretending it's privacy-compliant.

🤹‍♀️ Curveball Alert:
Even SPO, the great cleanup act, became another stack of logos in the sales deck. We said “simplify,” and vendors heard “add two more acronyms and call it curated.”

🧠 Thought Bubble:
The real problem? We keep mistaking quantity for progress. Like a hoarder saying their living room is more “layered.” Efficiency got replaced with “optionality,” which mostly just means the buyer is still confused and the seller’s broke.

🔥 The Big Question:
Can adtech actually get lean—or is the industry too addicted to complexity-as-a-service?

🎤 Industry Vibe Check:
Buyers are whispering about simplification. Sellers are nodding while quietly pitching their 7th-party data clean room overlay. And the rest of us? Just waiting for someone to say “maybe we don’t need another platform.”

Death by Dashboard: Adtech’s Love Affair with Complexity

Here’s the thing about adtech: it’s the only industry where solving a problem usually means adding another problem in a different font.

You’ve probably heard the phrase “more is more.” In this business? More is broken. And not charmingly broken like your ex’s vinyl collection—actually, functionally, expensively broken.

For years now, we’ve been layering on tech like we’re making some kind of artisanal mille-feuille of inefficiency. Every time a match rate drops, someone suggests—without irony—“Let’s just add another identity graph.” SSPs not delivering? No worries, just add seven more. Can’t make sense of your data? Boom: clean room. Not clean enough? How about a second one, just in case.

At some point, we stopped solving problems and started hoarding acronyms like they were NFTs circa 2021. 🧠

Let’s be honest: the current adtech stack isn’t a stack anymore—it’s a junk drawer. You know the one. Full of half-dead batteries, expired coupons, five USB cables that fit nothing you own, and a mysterious key that opens absolutely nothing. You keep adding to it because cleaning it out means confronting the mess.

Here’s where things get funnier, or sadder, depending on your perspective.

Adding more SSPs doesn’t mean better fill rates. It means bid duplication—the same impression being auctioned like a cheap knockoff at eight different tables. This isn’t strategy. This is spam. And don’t get me started on the identity sprawl. We’re running around with ten probabilistic IDs trying to reconcile them like we’re in some kind of data-themed group therapy session. “And how did it feel when your UID2 was ghosted by LiveRamp?”

And while we’re here—fee stacking. God bless fee stacking. Every vendor wants a piece of the pie, but by the time it reaches the publisher, it’s just crumbs and a note that says, “Exposure is the real value.” 🥧

Then there’s SPO, the grand promise of Supply Path Optimization. You’d think the goal was to simplify, to streamline, to—oh, I don’t know—optimize? But no. We took SPO and turned it into another glittery layer of complexity. Vendors rebranded redundancy as “curation.” Buyers started bragging that they’re only optimizing across 15 SSPs instead of 30. That’s like claiming you’ve simplified your diet by cutting from 14 desserts down to 8.

The truth? SPO now has its own identity crisis. It’s not optimization. It’s cosplay.

So why does this mess persist?

Because confusion is profitable. 🤑

Vendor lock-in is real. The more tools you use, the more embedded you become, the harder it is to break free—like a toxic relationship that insists it’s “just passionate.” And then there’s the ever-present FOMO. What if this new identity solution actually works? What if this clean room finally scrubs the data clean? What if we’re the only agency not using “AI-powered probabilistic predictive curation optimization?”

Spoiler: you're not missing out. You're just buying the same lie with a different logo.

And finally, let’s talk about the incentives. They’re all wrong. The people selling you “optional paths” and “interoperability” are making money off the complexity they created. Of course they don’t want you to clean the junk drawer. They want you to subscribe to a new junk drawer, but this one has blockchain.

Can adtech go lean? Sure. If we actually wanted to. But that would mean slicing SSPs down to a reasonable few, ditching half the ID solutions, and—this is wild—paying for outcomes instead of potential.

But here’s the problem: simplicity doesn’t sell well at conferences. Complexity comes with buzzwords and slide decks. Simplicity sounds like common sense, and nobody puts common sense in a pitch deck.

So unless the buyers grow a backbone and start demanding results over resumé-padding middleware, we’re just going to keep spinning. Faster. Louder. Pricier.

🔥 Hot take: the next “innovation” in adtech will just be the last one with a new dashboard and the word “agentic” slapped on it.

Until then, good luck with your Frankenstack. Just remember to feed it. It gets cranky.

Stay bold, stay curious, and know more than you did yesterday. 🧃

🔥 Why Subscribe to ADOTAT+?
Because this kind of sharp, irreverent, no-spin breakdown is just the free sample.

In ADOTAT+, you’ll get:

• 👀 Insider-only deep dives — like the real fallout from WPP’s InfoSum play and how it screws with everyone else's roadmaps.

• 💥 Behind-the-curtain power moves — who’s actually pulling strings (and who’s about to get pulled off the stage).

• 📊 The Adtech Numbers Game — fast, brutal stats that cut through PR fluff.

• 🧠 Strategic analysis — not some VC pitch deck regurgitation. Actual connective tissue between news, tech, and market shifts.

• 💸 Deals and drama — funding rounds, layoffs, lawsuits, whispers from pitch rooms, and who’s sleeping with whom (corporately speaking).

If the free version hits like a triple espresso, ADOTAT+ is the whiskey chaser.

Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.