Welcome to Retail Media: Where CTV Is the New Slotting Fee

Inside the shadow economy of implied mandates, 'performance triggers,' and off-record threats.

Pesach Lattin (ADOTAT)
May 20, 2025

Our Amazing Sponsor

🔥 “The champion of the open internet wants to turn it into their own walled garden.”

🧱 The Setup: You Wanted Shelf Space. They Sold You Prime Video.

Let’s get one thing clear: this isn’t media planning anymore. It’s hostage negotiation — and your product’s shelf placement is tied to a digital ransom note that reads: “Buy the full stack, or enjoy irrelevance.”

We’re entering a new era of what I’ll politely call corporate bundling with sharp elbows. Retailers — Amazon, Walmart, and their media-obsessed sidekicks like Roku — are no longer just offering ad placements. They’re offering terms. And not the kind you can just tweak in your DSP dashboard.

They’re selling access. Visibility. Reach. Search rank.
And the cost? Your media budget, carved up and reallocated according to their preferred media stack — not yours.

This isn’t a partnership. This is a "Steak Knife" deal. You know the kind. You go in to buy one thing — shelf space, a bit of search love — and suddenly you’re walking out with the whole 10-piece box set. Sponsored display. CTV inventory. Fire TV campaigns. First-party targeting bundles you didn’t ask for. Measurement “add-ons” that only measure how much control you’ve lost.

They don’t tell you this up front. They don’t write it in the RFP.
They whisper it on the call. They slide it into the JBP deck on page 47. They tell your VP of Sales the real deal in the green room at a category review.

“You want endcap space? You’ll need to support it with $2M in connected TV.”

“You want to keep page-one search rank? We’ll need to see 30% growth in your Prime Video spend this year.”

“We’re prioritizing omni-channel partners. I’m sure your media team can adjust.”

This is the new retail media economy — not built on data, but on quiet coercion and strategic bundling that blurs the lines between shopper marketing, national media, and corporate hardball.

Let me give you two real-world case studies. Names redacted (for now), but the deals? They’re real.

🍿 Brand A (Snack Category): The Roku Hook

The ask was simple: endcap placement across thousands of Walmart locations.
The catch? A required $2 million in CTV ad spend — not through just any platform, but via Roku, tied directly to Walmart shopper data.

“This was never presented as optional,” said one executive close to the deal.
“It was part of the ‘support plan.’”

The result? Sure, they got a nice sales lift in-store. But they also saw a 15% media budget overage on inventory they didn’t want, didn’t choose, and couldn’t clearly attribute to performance. The kicker? The CTV buy was billed as "premium targeting," yet half of it landed on mobile gaming apps repackaged for big screens.

💄 Brand B (Beauty Category): The Amazon Shell Game

This one’s even slicker.

Amazon’s media reps made it very clear — off the record, of course — that if Brand B wanted to maintain its search visibility for a flagship beauty product, it needed to grow its Prime Video investment. By how much? 30% YoY.

The brand pushed back. “We’re investing in TikTok right now,” they said.
The answer? “Totally understand. But that won’t help you on Amazon.”

To sweeten the poison, Amazon tied in access to the Brand Referral Bonus Program, which offers sellers fee reductions — but only if 20% of your CTV campaigns run through the Amazon DSP.

Welcome to the “spend or disappear” economy.

🧠 What’s Actually Happening Here

Let’s stop pretending this is just integrated media strategy. It’s not.
This is commercial blackmail, elegantly disguised as retail alignment.

Amazon doesn’t care if your TikTok campaign outperforms Prime Video.
Walmart doesn’t care if your programmatic plan excludes Roku.
What they care about is control — over your ad dollars, your targeting, and your media mix.

This is how they win:

They force brands to buy media inventory that serves their margin.
They convert shelf space into bundled media real estate.
They lock in spend without guaranteeing performance.
They define “partnership” as “you spend more, or someone else will.”

And no one’s saying this out loud — because no one wants to be the brand that admits it was strong-armed.

But trust me: this is the conversation happening behind closed doors at every Fortune 100 CPG media team this quarter.

🚨 You’ve Just Seen the Surface. Inside ADOTAT+:

🔒 The actual leaked spend breakdowns from these deals
🔒 One retailer’s full-tiered contract terms (Bronze to Platinum — and what you have to trade for page-one visibility)
🔒 The private agency negotiation scripts used to counter “CTV-first” mandates

👉 Subscribe for $50/month — Before your media budget gets sliced, bundled, and repackaged without your permission.

📺 SIDEBAR: The CTV–Shelf Space Dance

There’s smoke—maybe even a full-blown barbecue—around the idea that CTV ad spend is becoming the new price of entry for shelf space. While no one’s openly saying it’s a direct quid pro quo, a growing chorus of sources points to a not-so-subtle handshake between CTV investments and retail visibility:

Adweek spotlights the "flywheel" effect created by moves like Walmart buying Vizio—merchandising and media spinning together to build shopper momentum.
Skai’s 2025 State of CTV in Retail Media reports CTV ad spend is growing 3x faster than retail search. Why? Brands are tapping first-party commerce data to deliver laser-focused, personalized video campaigns.
MNTN Research sees upfront ad dollars shifting heavily into retailer-owned streaming platforms, giving brands a strategic path to both eyeballs and endcaps.
Adexchanger & IAS show how RMNs are stitching CTV and commerce together, giving brands more tools (and more pressure) to play across screens and shelves.
A 2024 industry report lays it bare: shopper marketing teams once ran trade promos and media buys—and now they’re using CTV to turn attention into conversion and media dollars into aisle power.

The implication? If you want shelf space, you might need screen space first.

The Shakedown: Leaked Deals, Quiet Threats, and the Bundling You Can’t Avoid

Let’s rewind.

In Part 1, we showed you what’s happening when you think you're just negotiating for shelf space or search visibility. The answer? You're not. What you’re really doing is walking into a media deal you didn’t ask for — one that ropes in connected TV, retail media, search, data partnerships, and, often, a whispered threat that if you don’t play ball, your product disappears.

Brands thought they were walking into a merchandising conversation.
What they got was a programmatic ransom note dressed up as a Joint Business Plan.

And now, in Part 2, we lay it bare.

Because the receipts? They’re here.

🧠 The Quiet Extortion: How “Shelf Space” Became a Media Bundle

Retailers like Amazon, Walmart, and Kroger are no longer just your distribution partner. They’re your DSP, your publisher, your data broker, your CTV placement handler — and your judge, jury, and executioner.

And if you're not writing media checks in every category, you're at risk of disappearing.

We've spoken to insiders, reviewed anonymized but disturbingly detailed contracts, and pieced together how today's JBPs work in the real world. These are the playbooks being handed to the biggest CPG brands — and the price of not playing along is very real.

Let’s break down three leaked deal structures that show exactly how media spend is now inseparably bundled with product placement.

🍿 Brand A (Walmart + Roku): “You Want the Endcap? Buy the Ads.”

A household-name snack brand negotiated for eight weeks of premium endcap placement in Walmart stores. But the catch? A $2 million CTV commitment through Roku, with targeting restricted to Walmart first-party data segments.

That wasn't optional. That was the ticket in the door.

Their JBP included:

Performance trigger: If in-store lift didn’t hit 5%, Walmart mandated an additional $500K in digital ads by Q4.
Data fee incentive: Roku buys had to flow through Walmart Connect’s DSP. Doing otherwise triggered a data surcharge.
Next year’s “ask”: 25% YoY media spend growth, minimum.

They didn’t just buy the shelf. They bought the screen time to justify it.

💄 Brand B (Amazon + Prime Video): “Pay to Stay on Page One”

This mid-sized beauty brand was already spending heavily on Sponsored Products and Sponsored Brands. But Amazon had new marching orders: boost Prime Video spend by 30% YoY, or risk losing top-tier search placement.

It wasn’t in the contract. It was "suggested" in the same way your landlord might suggest not complaining if you want to keep your deposit.

Inside their JBP:

Mandatory DSP routing: All off-site display retargeting had to run through Amazon DSP — even if it underperformed.
“Amazon’s Choice” badge at risk: Declining video spend quietly led to reduced visibility.
Incentive clause: If they grew CTV spend by 50%, Amazon reduced its Marketplace fees by 2%.

Translation? If you want to stay visible, you better feed the video beast.

🥣 Brand C (Kroger + Roku): The Loyalty-Data Lever

A nationally distributed cereal brand signed a JBP with Kroger Precision Marketing that blended in-store promotions, connected TV, and targeted display.

They committed $1.5M to off-site ads targeting Kroger loyalty households on Roku and other programmatic platforms.

The structure?

Incentive clause: Beat sales projections by 8% and get expanded in-aisle display + slotting fee discount.
Measurement baked in: Kroger tied the deal to attribution reports from Circana and Kroger’s own closed-loop data.
Penalty clause: Under-deliver, and the brand was contractually obligated to allocate an additional six-figure digital spend in Q4.

The message was clear: either you drive the results, or you double down.

🧩 What’s Really Inside These JBPs

Here’s the truth: JBPs are no longer strategic marketing documents.

They’re contracts designed to extract maximum multi-channel media spend in exchange for access to basic distribution infrastructure — the shelf, the search bar, the badge.

They’re built with:

Performance incentives that look like bonuses but function as margin locks
Mandated DSPs, so your dollars stay in the house
Attribution reports that sellers use to justify bigger “asks” next year
Unwritten penalties that your brand manager only hears about when your placement drops on day one of Q3

You’re not negotiating ad spend. You’re negotiating existence.

🧾 Media Allocation & Enforcement Breakdown

Brand	Media Allocation	Tactics & Platforms	Enforcement Mechanism
Brand A (Walmart)	- 25% Roku CTV - 35% Walmart Search & Display - 40% Trade Promos	- Walmart Connect DSP - Endcap attribution via IRI	- Endcap contingent on $2M Roku buy - Performance trigger: +$500K if sales lift < 5% - Mandated DSP
Brand B (Amazon)	- 15% Prime Video Ads - 50% Sponsored Search - 20% Paid Social - 15% Other	- Amazon DSP required - Freevee ads + Sponsored Display - Page-one defense	- Search visibility tied to 30% YoY CTV spend growth - Fee discounts conditional on DSP use - Loss of “Amazon’s Choice” badge
Brand C (Kroger)	- 30% CTV via KPM - 30% Digital Display & Social - 40% In-store Retail Media	- Roku + Kroger Loyalty Targeting - Circana Reporting - Kroger App Coupons	- Sales lift threshold triggers rebate - Missed goals = mandatory Q4 digital top-up - Display space tied to CTV attribution

🎯 Final Thought

The age of “I’ll take the shelf, skip the CTV” is dead.

You’re not buying product visibility anymore. You’re buying permission to participate — and you’re paying in bundled ad spend, managed DSP routes, and performance clauses written in disappearing ink.

Retailers have become your media partners, your sales gatekeepers, and your programmatic overlords — all in one. And if you're not negotiating like you're buying a media stack disguised as a merchandising agreement, you're already behind.

🚨 You’ve Just Seen the Surface. Inside ADOTAT+:

🔒 The full JBP contract from a top 5 retailer (Bronze, Gold, Platinum tiers)
🔒 The agency-side playbook for how to push back on DSP requirements
🔒 The bundled budget negotiation scripts they don’t want you using

👉 Subscribe for $50/month — Know what you’re signing before your budget does.

_{Editor’s Note:}_{The examples above are based on real-world deal structures reported in 2023–2025 across industry case studies, closed-door briefings, and leaked agency strategy decks. They reflect trends previously reported in AdExchanger, Retail Dive, FTC filings, marketing analyst briefings, and interviews with brand-side insiders. Specific brand names have been changed, but the terms are all too real.}

Subscribe to our premium content at ADOTAT+ to read the rest.

Become a paying subscriber to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Upgrade

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.

Welcome to Retail Media: Where CTV Is the New Slotting Fee

Subscribe to keep reading

Keep Reading

Wireframe